Search Results for "male victim"

465 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 465 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act and IPC. Father-Daughter Relationship Aggravates Offence; Medical Evidence and Victim Testimony Sufficient for Conviction.

The appellant, Bandu Vishwanath Matte, was convicted by the Extra Joint District Judge & Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Special (POCSO) Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Sexual Assault of Minor Orphan Girl Under POCSO Act and IPC. Court Relies on Testimony of Victim and School Teachers, Holds That Absence of Medical Evidence Does Not Disprove Sexual Assault When Victim's Testimony Is Credible.

The case involves an appeal by two accused, Sudhir Govindrao Suradkar and Santosh Nathaji Jumbde, against their conviction by the Special Judge (POCSO...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Whether Conviction Under Sections 376 and 354 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Is Sustainable on Evidence of Attempted Penetration. Court Considers Requirement of Penetration for Rape and Impact of Delayed FIR and Prior Opportunities to Complain.

The present appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Siddharth Dagadu Sonde, by the learned Special Judge, Pune, in Special Child Sessions C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape and Unnatural Offence on 3-Year-Old Girl. Testimony of Minor Victim Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 376(2)(f) and 377 IPC.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from the conviction of Patiram Gangaram Shelokar for the rape and unnatural offence committed on a 3-year-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age — Benefit of Doubt Given as Prosecution Failed to Establish Minority of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 4, 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ashik Ramjan Ansari, was convicted by the Special Judge at Greater Bombay in POCSO Special Case No.203 of 2016 for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Age of Victim Determined by Ossification Test and School Records, Consent Irrelevant for Minor.

The appellant, Sujoy @ Sanjay Laltu Chakravarty, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, in Special POCSO Case No. 11/2014 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Two Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix. Conviction under Section 376(2) IPC set aside as evidence of prosecutrix was found to be untrustworthy and contradictory.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by original accused persons, Ali Mohd. Subrati Khan (Accused No.2) and Mobin Sherali Khan (Accused No.1),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Medical Evidence and Non-Examination of Material Witness. Conviction under Sections 363, 377 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove penetrative sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dilip Jaglal Warkhede, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) and Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vikas Shantaram Shinde, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 376(2)(i)(j)(n) and 506 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO...