Search Results for "land use regulation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "land use regulation"

1276 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1276 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

6 May 2026

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landowners' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Remands for Re-determination of Market Value Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966. Reference Court Directed to Determine Compensation Based on Comparable Sale Deeds and NA Potential, After Setting Aside Orders That Denied Proper Opportunity to the Affected Landowners.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute arose out of acquisition of 5 acres 20 guntas of land in Malkhed village, Gulbarga, Karnataka, for industrial development by the Karnataka...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Mar 2016

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022

2 May 2025

The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Petition Challenging Construction of Residential Building and Public Parking Lot under DCR and MRTP Act — Court Examines Legality of Approvals and Concessions Granted by Municipal Commissioner. The Court Considers Whether Circular Restricting Public Parking Lots to Four Floors Overrides Provisions of DCR 33(24) and Implications of Notices under Sections 51 and 53(1) of MRTP Act.

13 May 2013

The Public Interest Litigation petition filed in 2012 before the Bombay High Court challenged the legality of approvals and construction of a 56‑sto...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.

24 Oct 2019

The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Landowners Entitled to Retain Excess Land After Repeal of Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1961. The Court held that since the land had not vested in the State prior to the repeal, the landowners are entitled to retain the excess land under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling (Repeal) Act, 1999.

29 Jan 2025

The case involves three writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) against a common order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal on Classification of Bid Lands Under Agricultural and Urban Land Ceiling Laws. The core issue is whether Bid lands of former princes are agricultural lands subject to ceiling under the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 or excluded under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

1 Aug 2026

The State of Gujarat and the Mamlatdar filed a civil appeal in the Supreme Court against the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat which had set aside...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines PIL for Heritage Conservation — Government's Omission of Buildings from Heritage List Without Consultation and Reasons Under Section 31 of MRTP Act Challenged. Petitioner Society Asserts That Statutory Procedure Was Not Followed and Heritage Conservation Committee's Recommendations Were Ignored.

5 May 2006

The Vidarbha Heritage Society, a registered society formed in 1997, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Claim of Automatic Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 49(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Argued That Failure to Acquire Land Within Prescribed Period After Purchase Notice Entitled Them to Release From Reservation.

11 Jan 2012

The petitions arose from the reservation of land in Andheri, Mumbai, for a public garden under successive development plans. The petitioner, Mehtab La...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)