Search Results for "further cross-examination"

1266 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1266 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR — Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Guruprasad Daulat Bhalavi, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case 224/2016 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Allegation of Pushing Victim from Running Train Fails as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Contradict Prosecution Version.

The appellants, Kanchan Deokisanjee Panpalia and Tara Harishkumar Panpalia, were convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Murder of a 4-Year-Old Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The Court held that the chain of circumstances, including last seen evidence and medical evidence, was complete and pointed to the guilt of the appellant.

The appellant, Ananta Tukaram Chaudhary, was convicted by the trial court for the rape and murder of a 4-year-old girl, Sanjana, and for causing disap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Hurt in Land Dispute — Common Intention Established. Appellants convicted under Sections 302 and 324 read with Section 34 IPC for fatal assault on deceased with sticks and axes.

The case involves an appeal by Sahebrao and Ramesh Shejul against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, in Sessions Case No. 72 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Accused's Conduct and Recovery of Weapons Form Chain of Circumstances Proving Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Nilesh Ramesh Joshi, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his mother, Uma Joshi, and sentenced to life imprisonment. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Korde, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 2 of 2007 for offences under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Damodhar Rambhau Inchal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 102 of 2008 for offences under...