Search Results for "employer's mistake"

225 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Cancellation by TWAD Board — Holds That Cancellation Without Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and That Tender Conditions Must Be Strictly Construed.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various contractors challenging the cancellation of a tender issued by the Tamil Nadu Water Supply ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits for Broken Period Service in Government Polytechnic College Case. Court directs condonation of break from 13.06.1965 to 29.06.1966 for pensionable service under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, Deelip S/o Harishchandra Jadhav, a retired employee of Government Polytechnic College, Dhule, filed two writ petitions seeking pension...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part in TDS Dispute Regarding Payments to Doctors by Hospital. Payments to doctors with fixed plus variable pay under written contracts treated as salary subject to TDS under Section 192 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Lab Chemist Challenging Termination by Sugar Factory. Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Reinstatement Upheld as Domestic Enquiry Was Fair and Proper Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Arvind s/o Ramnath Lipane, was employed as a Lab Chemist with the respondent, Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory. Dur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Date of Birth Correction in School Record Due to Delay and Lack of Evidence. Petitioner sought correction after 30 years of service, but court held that belated application without contemporaneous evidence cannot be entertained under Article 226.

The petitioner, Azam Khan Pathan, was working as an Administrative Officer in Pratishthan Mahavidyalaya, Paithan, and was due for retirement within 7-...