Search Results for "district consumer commission"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Consumer Protection Appointment Rules; Selection Committee Procedure Under Scrutiny. Court Considers Whether Rules Violate Article 14 and Supreme Court Directions in State of UP v. UP Consumer Protection Bar Association.

These two petitions challenged the Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Telecom Service Provider Jurisdiction - Section 7B of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Does Not Bar Consumer Forums from Adjudicating Disputes with Private Service Providers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The civil appeal originated from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 26 May 2016, which affirmed the juris...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to 399-Day Delay — Condonation Denied for Lack of Sufficient Cause. Internal administrative delays and employee turnover held not sufficient to explain each day of delay under Section 51 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by SBI General Insurance Company Ltd. against an order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Orders in Execution Proceedings. No Jurisdictional Error Found in Attachment of Property for Enforcement of Consumer Award Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioners, M/s Sequeira Star Home Builders and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Reappointment of District Forum Presidents Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 10(2) of the Act Prescribes a Single Term of Five Years or Until Age 65, Barring Reappointment.

The judgment addresses a common question arising in multiple writ petitions: whether the President of a District Forum constituted under Section 10 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Withdrawal of Second Appeal in Consumer Dispute Due to Settlement. The appellant sought withdrawal of the complaint after settlement, and the Commission disposed of the appeal as withdrawn without adjudicating on merits.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) was hearing a second appeal filed by Sreenivasan, proprietor of Garudan Appallam Company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Proceedings as Not Maintainable. Section 28 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Bars Suits Against Forum Members for Acts Done in Good Faith.

The petitioner, Smt. Sheela Sanjay Sharma, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...