National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Withdrawal of Second Appeal in Consumer Dispute Due to Settlement. The appellant sought withdrawal of the complaint after settlement, and the Commission disposed of the appeal as withdrawn without adjudicating on merits.

Tribunals: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
  • 26
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) was hearing a second appeal filed by Sreenivasan, proprietor of Garudan Appallam Company, against an order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Tamil Nadu. The respondents included Karthika and several government officials. During the hearing, the counsel for the appellant submitted that the matter had been settled between the parties and sought to withdraw the complaint. The Commission, considering the submissions, disposed of the second appeal as withdrawn. The order was passed by a bench comprising AVM J. Rajendra (Presiding Member) and Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta (Member). The appeal was disposed of without any further adjudication on merits.

Headnote

A) Consumer Law - Withdrawal of Complaint - Settlement - The appellant sought to withdraw the complaint on the ground that the matter had been settled between the parties. The Commission allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn, considering the submissions made. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be allowed to be withdrawn as the matter has been settled between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Second Appeal No. NC/SA/401/2025 is disposed of as withdrawn.

Law Points

  • Settlement between parties
  • withdrawal of complaint
  • disposal as withdrawn
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (NCDRC) (01) 3

Second Appeal No. NC/SA/401/2025

2025-07-18

AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM VSM (Retd.), Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta

Mr. M. P. Parthiban and Mr. Geyolin Selvam

Sreenivasan

Karthika, Deputy Director, Superintending Engineer, Labour Welfare Officer, Food Safety Officer, Thasildhar, District Collector

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Tamil Nadu

Remedy Sought

Withdrawal of the complaint due to settlement between parties

Filing Reason

The appellant sought to withdraw the complaint as the matter had been settled.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 11th September 2024 in Appeal SC/33/A/240/2024 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Tamil Nadu

Issues

Whether the appeal should be allowed to be withdrawn as settled between parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted on instructions that the matter has already been settled between the parties and therefore seeks to withdraw the Complaint.

Ratio Decidendi

When parties settle the dispute, the complaint may be withdrawn and the appeal disposed of as withdrawn.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits on instructions that the matter has already been settled between the parties and therefore, seeks to withdraw the Complaint.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a second appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission against the order dated 11th September 2024 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Tamil Nadu. During the hearing, the appellant sought withdrawal of the complaint on the ground of settlement. The Commission disposed of the appeal as withdrawn on 18th July 2025.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Withdrawal of Second Appeal in Consumer Dispute Due to Settlement. The appellant sought withdrawal of the complaint after settlement, and the Commission disposed of the appeal as withdrawn withou...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Novartis India Ltd. in Transfer Dispute. Medical Sales Representative Held to be Workman Concerned Under Section 33(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.