Search Results for "distribution company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "distribution company"

1445 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1445 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Petition Challenging Ombudsman's Order to Restore Consumer's Electricity Supply. The Court upheld the Ombudsman's jurisdiction to entertain billing disputes and direct reconnection without precondition of payment of disputed dues.

8 Jan 2020

The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from the same order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated 17.10.2018. The first petition was filed by th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's Open Access Regulations in Challenge by Industrial Consumers. The Court held that the RERC has jurisdiction to regulate both intra-state and inter-state open access, and the restrictions imposed are reasonable and within the statutory framework of the Electricity Act, 2003.

1 Apr 2025

The present appeals challenge two separate orders of the Rajasthan High Court upholding the validity of the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commissio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

6 Jun 2025

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Licensee, Holds Captive Users Not Liable for Additional Surcharge Under Section 42(4) of Electricity Act, 2003. Captive generation and open access for self-consumption are statutory rights under Section 9, not requiring State Commission permission, thus additional surcharge is not leviable.

10 Dec 2021

The case involves an appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (the distribution licensee) against the order of the Appellate Trib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement Involving Gift of Shares and Reduction of Securities Premium Account. The court held that a scheme involving a gift of shares held by a company in another company to its shareholders and a reduction of the securities premium account by the book value of the investment is an arrangement under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, and the reduction of the securities premium account does not require compliance with the procedure for reduction of share capital under Sections 100-104 of the Companies Act, 1956 or Section 52 of the Companies Act, 2013.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Indian Seamless Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking sanction of a schem...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Debarment Order in Transformer Supply Contract Dispute — Modification of Debarment Period Upheld but Effective Date Changed. The High Court's modification of the debarment effective date from 30.07.2020 to 13.02.2020 was upheld as within its discretion, and no interference was warranted.

13 Dec 2021

The appellant, a proprietorship firm engaged in manufacturing and repairing transformers, had been supplying to Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut V...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Act Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Captive Generating Plant Wheeling Power to Own Units Is a Generating Company, Not Open Access Consumer, Under Section 86(1)(f). The Court Clarifies That Section 86(1)(f) Covers Disputes Between Licensees and Generating Companies, and the Appellant's Captive Power Plant Qualifies as a Generating Company.

4 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularisation of Temporary Employees in MSEDCL — Project-Based Workers Not Entitled to Regularisation. Temporary employees engaged for electrification of tribal hamlets under Maharashtra State Electricity Board held not entitled to regularisation as their employment was co-terminus with the project and not against sanctioned posts.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, a group of temporary employees, were engaged as electricians and wiremen by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) for a spec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

30 Oct 2015

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

8 Apr 2014

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)