Search Results for "distinct commercial goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "distinct commercial goods"

586 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Classification of Non-Ferrous Metal Castings as Ingots Under Entry C-I-29 of Schedule C to Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court held that aluminum castings manufactured by the respondent are covered by the entry for non-ferrous metal ingots, rejecting the Revenue's contention that they are distinct products.

30 Oct 2015

The case involves a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Upon Challenge to Pre-Deposit Order and Validity of Explanation to Schedule Entry A-45 of MVAT Act, 2002. The Petition Seeks Quashing of Assessment and Pre-Deposit Orders for Pan Masala Containing Tobacco Exemption Denial and Striking Down of Discriminatory Notification.

4 Oct 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of pan masala with and without tobacco, challenged the levy of VAT on pan masala contai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules Against Export Tax Exemption for Helium Gas Supplied to ONGC at Mumbai High. Sales to ONGC at Mumbai High Not Exports Under Section 5(1) Central Sales Tax Act as Mumbai High Is Not a Foreign Destination.

9 Jan 2012

The case involves a sales tax reference under Section 61(4) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Levy of Excise Duty on Fabrication and Construction of Structurals - Activities Do Not Amount to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Fabrication at site results in immovable property, not excisable goods.

29 Apr 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. and Ceat Tyres of India ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Sales Tax/VAT Cases on Vehicle Hire Contracts, Finding No Transfer of Right to Use Goods. Contracts Where Contractor Retained Control, Maintenance Responsibility, and Risk Do Not Constitute Deemed Sale Under Article 366(29A)(d) of Constitution of India and Assam Tax Acts.

9 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court considered a group of appeals concerning tax liability under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 and Assam Value Added Tax Act, 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State’s Appeal in Sales Tax Matter Concerning Deduction of Excise Duty. Raw Tobacco and Processed Chewing Tobacco Constitute Different Marketable Products, So Excise Duty Paid on Raw Tobacco Cannot Be Deducted from Turnover of Chewing Tobacco Under Rule 5(1)(i) of Madras General Sales Tax (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, 1939.

14 Dec 1965

The respondent, a tobacco factory in Vedaranyam, purchased raw tobacco and, after processing it, sold it as chewing tobacco. Excise duty under the Cen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Copyright Infringement Case, Upholding High Court's Restoration of Suit for Trial. The Court held that rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC was premature as factual issues regarding applicability of Section 15(2) of Copyright Act, 1957, required determination on merits regarding whether engineering drawings constituted a 'design' under Designs Act, 2000, and were reproduced more than fifty times by industrial process.

15 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court adjudicated appeals arising from a copyright infringement dispute between Inox India Limited (the respondent) and Cryogas Equipment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

1 Mar 2021

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)