Search Results for "development agreement termination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "development agreement termination"

956 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 956 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against AGRC Order Reinstating Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner Society Challenges AGRC Order that Set Aside SRA De-clubbing and Reinstated Developer Despite Alleged Non-compliance with Mandatory NOC from MHADA Under DCR 33(10) and Section 13(2) Proceedings.

7 Jul 2023

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by a co-operative housing society an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Case. Appellate Tribunal's Suo Motu Adjudication on Termination of Agreement Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction.

25 Aug 2023

The case involves an appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA Act) filed by Satyam Developers, the prom...

High Court

High Court of Bombay examines challenge to Industrial Court order that dismissed revision applications against Labour Court’s dismissal of complaints alleging unfair labour practices under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act. The lower courts held that complaints were not maintainable under Item 1 of Schedule IV, being more appropriately under Item 6, and that termination of services was by efflux of time under contract, not retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.

26 Oct 2016

The dispute arose from complaints filed by sixteen women packers employed on temporary basis by a pharmaceutical company since 1985. They alleged that...

High Court

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 350 OF 2017

28 Jan 2020

The case concerns two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14 February ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sale-Cum-Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2015

The petitioner, MSRT Corporation, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

19 Nov 2025

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Construction in Powai and Tirandaz — No Breach of Tripartite Agreement or ULC Act Exemption Found. The court held that the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans and permissions, and the challenge to the exemption order was barred by delay and laches.

22 Feb 2012

The judgment concerns three Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Kamlakar Motiram Satve, Rajendra Thacker, and Medha Patkar challenging the con...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund to Flat Purchaser for Inordinate Delay in Possession — Builder's Unfair Contract Terms Not Binding. Builder's failure to apply for occupancy certificate within stipulated time constitutes deficiency of service; one-sided clauses in Apartment Buyer's Agreement are unfair and not binding under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Property Sale Agreement Due to Plaintiffs' Default and Unauthorized Payments. Plaintiffs Failed to Pay Balance Consideration Within Stipulated 10-Month Period and Dealt with Sole Director Contrary to Board Resolution Requiring Joint Action.

7 May 2010

The suit was filed by the plaintiffs, Pankaj Anantrai Bhuwa & others, against the defendant, M/s. Ramkumar Shivchandray & Sons, seeking specific perfo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)