Search Results for "condonation of delay"

609 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 609 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act, Condoning 258-Day Delay. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Partnership Disputes Arising from Deed of Alteration of Partnership Dated 10 April 2013.

The applicant, Infra Poonam Developers LLP, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Substitution of Heirs in Civil Appeal. Delay of 1537 days condoned as sufficient cause shown for bringing legal representatives of deceased respondents on record in pending first appeal against decree under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The present application was filed by the applicants, Vikramsinh Kanjibhai and another, seeking condonation of delay of 1537 days in filing an applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application by Superintending Archaeologist in Land Acquisition Appeal. Delay of 718 days not sufficiently explained; mere administrative procedure not a valid ground for condonation.

The present application was filed by the Superintending Archaeologist seeking condonation of 718 days delay in filing the First Appeal against the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Applications by State in Land Acquisition Appeals Due to Unexplained Delay of 2014 Days. Delay of 2014 days in filing first appeal against land acquisition award not sufficiently explained, as state failed to provide cogent reasons for each day of delay.

The judgment pertains to a batch of civil applications filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Unit 1 and another (the State) under Section 5 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Application in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Unexplained Delay of 2608 Days Not Condonable. The Court held that administrative delays by the State do not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The State of Gujarat and its officers filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of 2608 days delay in fili...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of 718-Day Delay in Filing Appeal by Superintending Archaeologist in Land Acquisition Reference Cases. Delay Condoned Subject to Costs of Rs. 15,000 per Application Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, presided over by Honourable Mrs. Justice M. K. Thakker, delivered a common oral judgment on 16/01/2026 in a ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Condonation of Delay Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 774 days not condoned as state failed to explain each day's delay with cogent evidence.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer and another applicant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of 774 days ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Unexplained Delay of 822 Days. The court held that the State cannot claim benefit of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 when the delay is not properly explained and the application lacks sufficient cause.

The present applications were filed by the State of Gujarat through the Special Land Acquisition Officer seeking condonation of delay of 822 days in f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition for Inordinate Delay of 794 Days — Condonation Refused Due to Unsatisfactory Explanation. Delay of 794 days in filing review petition not condoned as explanation was unsatisfactory, leading to dismissal on limitation grounds.

The State of Gujarat and another petitioner filed a review petition before the Supreme Court against an order in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 33...