Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of 718-Day Delay in Filing Appeal by Superintending Archaeologist in Land Acquisition Reference Cases. Delay Condoned Subject to Costs of Rs. 15,000 per Application Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, presided over by Honourable Mrs. Justice M. K. Thakker, delivered a common oral judgment on 16/01/2026 in a batch of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing First Appeals. The lead application was Civil Application No. 5657 of 2025, filed by the Superintending Archaeologist against Hirabhai Laxmanbhai (since deceased through heirs) and others. The applications sought condonation of a delay of 718 days in challenging the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2023 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bhachau, District Kutch, in Land Acquisition Reference (LAR) No. 20 of 2017 and allied matters. The learned advocate for the applicant, Mr. Ankit Shah, submitted that the certified copy of the impugned judgment was applied for on 23.08.2023 and delivered on the same day, but due to administrative procedures and the need to obtain sanctions, the appeal could not be filed within the limitation period. The learned advocate for the respondents, Mr. Jigneshkumar Nayak, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader opposed the condonation, arguing that the delay was inordinate and not sufficiently explained. The court, after hearing both sides, observed that a liberal approach is required for government departments and that the delay was sufficiently explained. The court condoned the delay subject to the applicant paying costs of Rs. 15,000 per application to the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority. The court directed that the costs be deposited within four weeks and that the First Appeals be registered and heard on merits.

Headnote

A) Limitation Act - Condonation of Delay - Section 5 - Sufficient Cause - Government Department - The applicant, Superintending Archaeologist, sought condonation of 718 days delay in filing appeal against land acquisition award. The court held that a liberal approach is warranted for government departments, and the delay was sufficiently explained due to administrative procedures. The delay was condoned subject to costs of Rs. 15,000 per application. (Paras 1-10)

B) Land Acquisition - Reference under Section 18 - Compensation Enhancement - The impugned judgment dated 31.07.2023 enhanced compensation for acquired land. The applicant challenged the same, and the court condoned the delay to allow adjudication on merits. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay of 718 days in filing the First Appeal should be condoned on the ground of sufficient cause, considering the applicant is a government department.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The delay of 718 days is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 15,000 per application to the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority, to be deposited within four weeks. The First Appeals to be registered and heard on merits.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Sufficient cause
  • Liberal approach for government departments
  • Section 5 of Limitation Act
  • 1963
  • Delay of 718 days condoned
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:3838

R/Civil Application (For Condonation of Delay) No. 5657 of 2025 in F/First Appeal No. 33155 of 2025 with connected matters

2026-01-16

M. K. Thakker

2026:GUJHC:3838

Mr. Ankit Shah, Ms. Himani Shah (AGP), Mr. Jigneshkumar M. Nayak

Superintending Archaeologist

Hirabhai Laxmanbhai Since Deceased Through Heirs & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil application for condonation of delay in filing first appeal against land acquisition reference judgment.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of 718 days delay in filing First Appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2023.

Filing Reason

Delay occurred due to administrative procedures and obtaining sanctions.

Previous Decisions

Judgment and decree dated 31.07.2023 passed by Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bhachau, District Kutch in LAR No.20 of 2017 and allied matters.

Issues

Whether the delay of 718 days in filing the First Appeal should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant submitted that delay was due to administrative procedures and obtaining sanctions. Respondents opposed condonation citing inordinate delay and lack of sufficient cause.

Ratio Decidendi

A liberal approach is warranted for government departments in condonation of delay applications, and the delay was sufficiently explained due to administrative procedures. Delay condoned subject to costs.

Judgment Excerpts

Since the issue raised in the these applications are similar, they are being decided by a common judgment. The present application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 718 days in filing the First Appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2023 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bhachau, District Kutch, in LAR No.20 of 2017 with allied matters.

Procedural History

The impugned judgment and decree were passed on 31.07.2023. Certified copy applied on 23.08.2023 and delivered. The present applications for condonation of delay were filed in 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of 718-Day Delay in Filing Appeal by Superintending Archaeologist in Land Acquisition Reference Cases. Delay Condoned Subject to Costs of Rs. 15,000 per Application Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Upholds Life Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Love Affair. The court held that the prosecution established a complete chain of circumstances under Sections 302, 201, and 120-B IPC, including ...