Search Results for "compensation under protest"

451 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 451 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Agreement Not a Bar to Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Payment under agreement does not extinguish right to seek higher compensation if agreement was not voluntary or was under coercion.

The appellant, Syed Miya s/o Syed Buran, filed two appeals challenging the judgment and award dated 20.8.1993 passed by the Reference Court, which rej...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Second Appeal in Land Acquisition, Enhances Compensation to Rs.3,00,000/- Per Acre Based on 10% Escalation. Interest Under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable Only From Date of Award, Following Supreme Court Precedent in Karigowda.

The case arose from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Mugabasava village, Bailhongal taluk, Belgaum District, for the Malaprabha Reservoir Proj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Illegal Handcuffing and Public Parading in Chapter Case Arrest. Police Action Violated Article 21 as Handcuffing Without Justification and Public Parading Amounted to Cruel Treatment, Compensation of Rs. 50,000 Awarded.

The petitioner, Shri Kisan @ Kisanchand Tharurmal Wadhawa, a resident of Gandhinagar, Kolhapur, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the action ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Reference Court's Award of Rs.5 Lakh for Sewerage Treatment Plant Land. Claimants' Restricted Claim Due to Financial Constraints Does Not Bar Higher Compensation if Justified by Potential Value.

The Deputy Director Town Planning of Amravati Municipal Corporation appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court in L.A.C. No.215/2003, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...