Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

790 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 790 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute — Arbitration Clause Requires Multiple Arbitrators. The court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitration clause specifying 'arbitrators' in plural and 'one by each party' mandates appointment of multiple arbitrators, not a sole arbitrator.

4 Sep 2013

The case involves an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Mrs. Perin Hoshang Davierwalla and anothe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Multiple Petitions for Arbitrator Appointment in BBMP Contract Disputes. Petitioners Seek Independent Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act for Claims Under Clause 10 of Agreement Dated 15.03.2007.

17 Mar 2015

The matter involves multiple Civil Miscellaneous Petitions (CMP) filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitrati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Referral of Admiralty Suit to Arbitration Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Arbitration Agreement Enforceable Despite Admiralty Claim. The court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement between parties mandates referral of the dispute to arbitration, and the admiralty suit cannot proceed in court.

6 Jul 2005

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking referral of an admiralty...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute; Upholds Legal Successor's Right to Enforce Arbitration Agreement. Non-Consent to Assignment by Employer Does Not Extinguish Original Contractor's Rights; Limitation Period Held Not Barred Due to Continuing Proceedings Under Contract's Dispute Resolution Mechanism.

31 Oct 2017

The dispute arose from a construction contract for the Bombay Sewage Project awarded by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) to a German...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — CMD's Ineligibility to Act as Arbitrator Renders Appointment Void Ab Initio. Express Agreement in Writing Under Section 12(5) Proviso Must Be Post-Dispute and Cannot Be Inferred from Pre-Dispute Conduct.

10 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Broadband Network Limited (BBNL) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had rejecte...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Contractual Dispute Under Section 11(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Arbitration Despite Respondent's Objections on Limitation and Existence of Dispute.

5 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/S Santech Engineers Pvt Ltd, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Application Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Respondent's Delayed Nomination of Three Arbitrators After Filing of Application Does Not Bar Court's Power to Appoint Arbitrator.

22 Jul 2015

The applicant, M/s. Krishna Industries, a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator Mandate Due to Expiry of Time Limit Under Arbitration Clause — Failure to Complete Arbitration Within Stipulated Period Results in Termination of Arbitrator's Authority. The court held that the mandate of the arbitrator stood terminated under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitration was not completed within the time limit prescribed in clause 21 of the agreement.

1 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Teltech Instrumentation Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices Under Dealership Agreement. The court found that the arbitration clause in the Dealership Agreement dated 19/06/2013 was valid and disputes existed, warranting appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Petitions for Enforcement and Setting Aside of Foreign Arbitration Award — Partial Award on Jurisdiction Upheld; Challenge under Section 34 Considered Inappropriate for Foreign Award. Enforcement of Award under Sections 44-49 Proceeded While Section 34 Petition Found Not Maintainable Against a Foreign Award Governed by English Law.

9 May 2014

The dispute arose from an agency agreement between Perma Container (UK) Line Limited (claimant), a UK company, and Perma Container Line (India) Pvt. L...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)