Search Results for "arbitrator bias"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitration Award in Property Division Dispute. Power of Attorney Appointing Panchas Held to Be Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a decision of a Learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Enforcement of Foreign Award on Grounds of Arbitrator Bias — Upholds High Court Order. Alleged Conflict of Interest of Presiding Arbitrator Not Sufficient to Refuse Enforcement Under Section 48(2)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award. The dispute arose from a Share Subscription Agreement bet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Validity of Arbitrator's Interim Order Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in MAPA Escrow Dispute. The Court Examines Whether the Order Preventing Parties from Proceeding Before Escrow Agents Was Justified.

The High Court of Bombay, in an arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, considered a challenge to an inte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ex-Parte Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute. Court holds that non-participation in arbitration despite notice and failure to prove fraud or bias does not warrant setting aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, The Loot (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, were borrowers and guarantors who had taken a loan from Reliance Capital Limited (the f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Electricity Transmission Contract Dispute. Court upholds majority award granting escalation costs and interest to contractor for delays caused by principal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd., challenged a majority arbitral award dated 6 January 2017 under Section 34 of the...