W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 AND
9 Jul 2026The judgment text provided only includes the case title, party names, and procedural details. No facts, legal issues, arguments, or decision are avail...
Search Results for "Seniority Dispute"
897 result(s) found
Found 897 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Compassionate Appointees' Challenge to Seniority Fixation Below Direct Recruits Due to Unexplained Delay. Section 40(2) of Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 Permits Determination of Seniority by Date of Appointment Where Recruitment Methods Vary, and Impugned 2007 Order Remained Unquestioned for Over a Decade.
19 Feb 2025The dispute arose out of the seniority fixation of Junior Assistants appointed on compassionate grounds in the Agriculture Department of Tamil Nadu. T...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Temporary AEEs in Panchayat Raj Department — Quashes High Court Order Striking Down Regularization G.O.M. No. 262. Seniority of Pre-1994 Appointees Must Be Counted from Initial Appointment Date, Not Below Later Recruits.
12 Feb 2025The case involves appeals by temporary Assistant Executive Engineers (AEEs) appointed between 1990-1992 in the Panchayat Raj Department of Andhra Prad...
- 709
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Supersession of Senior Teacher in Higher Secondary School — Mala Fides and Breach of Goa School Education Act, 1984 and Rules, 1986 Established. Court Quashes Promotion of Fourth Respondent and Directs Consideration of Petitioner's Claim for Headmaster Post Based on Seniority and Merit.
4 Nov 2023The petitioner, Jairam N. Kerkar, the senior-most teacher in the feeder category at Dnyanprakash Mandal Bicholim Higher Secondary School, challenged h...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions in Inter Se Seniority and Head of School Appointment Dispute. Seniority determined by date of joining as Assistant Teacher, not by date of acquiring higher qualification.
23 Feb 2022The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Pandurang Kurhe and Namdeo Sase, both Assistant Teachers in a school run by Samta Shikshan Prasarak ...
- 24
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Ex-Servicemen's Appeal in Seniority Fixation Case Under Punjab Civil Service Rules. Appellants Not Entitled to Military Service Benefits Under Repealed 1972 Rules as Appointment Made Under 1982 Rules After Advertisement Issued Post-Enforcement.
26 Mar 2021The dispute involved ex-servicemen appellants who were appointed to the Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) in 1986 after being released from the ...
- 216
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.
14 Feb 2020The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...
- 190
High Court
High Court Quashes Order Excluding B.Ed. Teachers from Seniority List of Trained Graduate Teachers; Holds That B.Ed. Alone Sufficient Under G.R. 11/11/2011. B.Ed. Qualification Alone Confers Trained Graduate Status Overriding Earlier G.R. Requiring D.Ed.
27 Jun 2019Two groups of primary school teachers approached the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the exclusion of their names from th...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reversion of Head Clerk to Senior Clerk. Reversion Upheld as Petitioner Was Junior to Respondent No. 5 and Appointment Was Subject to Seniority Determination Under Maharashtra University Act, 1994.
31 Jan 2019The petitioner, Khalil Ahamad Khan, was employed as a Senior Clerk at Amolakchand Mahavidyalaya, Yavatmal. He was promoted to Head Clerk on 01.06.2006...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Employees Due to Wrong Fixation of Pay Scales. The Court held that recovery is permissible when the employee had knowledge of the error or when the mistake is a continuing wrong, and the principle of no recovery does not apply in such cases.
18 Jan 2019The petitioners, 13 employees of Thane Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the Corporation's decision to recover excess salary pa...
- 119
