Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 AND

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
Admin
2026-08-01 11:10:20
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment text provided only includes the case title, party names, and procedural details. No facts, legal issues, arguments, or decision are available.

Issue of Consideration

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 AND

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (07) 86

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 and C.M.P.Nos.29531, 29533, 29743 and 29744 of 2025

2026-07-09

Justice S.M.Subramaniam, Justice N.Senthilkumar

2026:MHC:2812

C.Venkatesan, M.Anbazhagan

R.Karthikeyan, V.Mariappan, K.Gopinath, G.Thayalan, M.Eranian, Meenakshisundaram, T.Thirunavukkarasu, State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Home Department, The Director General of Police, A.Arun, G.Karthik, A.Arun, S.Ameer ali Jinna, U.M.Avinash, R.Stephen Vinodh, S.Madhan Kumar, Chelladurai, R.Tamilselvi, J.Deepa, Manoj Kumar, G.Gopal, Manoj M.T, C.Manjula, C.Madhavi, S.Elavarasi, S.Shunmugasundaram, R.R. Venkatesan, N.Maharajan, D.Augustin, M.Ranjith, V.Dilipkumar, C.Kanagaraj, Ramakrishnan, R.Manjula Devi, P.Vijayakumar, R.Meena, K.Madhavan, S.Suresh, P.Samuthirakani, G.Gopinath, P.Ravindran, M.Jayalakshmi, V.Ananthi, R.Rajarajeswari, M.Venugopal, P.Premkumar, M.Mukunthan, D.Manojkumar, S.Sathishkumar, G.Ponthilakraj, G.Vignesh Guru, S.Mani, R.Ramachandran, P.Shanthi, S.Mohandoss, S.Kanagaraj, G.Manikumar, C.A.Kesavan, K.Karuppasamy Pandian

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Procedural History

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 filed; respondents 23-25 impleaded as per order dated 06.01.2026; respondents 26-56 impleaded as per order dated 28.01.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Endorsement in Co-operative Society Dispute — Directs Implementation of Earlier Enquiry Order. Registrar's subsequent direction to visit society set aside as it conflicted with prior order already under implementatio... 2026-08-01 11:10:20
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petition Against Pensionary Benefits for Daily Wagers Made Permanent. Past Daily Wage Service Counts as Qualifying Service for Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. 2026-08-01 11:10:20
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder Compensation burden of proof benefit of doubt Limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Staying Arbitral Proceedings and Rej...

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI's Order Against Kotak Mutual Fund for Violating SEBI Circular o...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Lost Your Password?