Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 AND

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
Admin
2026-11-09 21:02:12
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment text provided only includes the case title, party names, and procedural details. No facts, legal issues, arguments, or decision are available.

Issue of Consideration

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 AND

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (07) 86

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 and C.M.P.Nos.29531, 29533, 29743 and 29744 of 2025

2026-07-09

Justice S.M.Subramaniam, Justice N.Senthilkumar

2026:MHC:2812

C.Venkatesan, M.Anbazhagan

R.Karthikeyan, V.Mariappan, K.Gopinath, G.Thayalan, M.Eranian, Meenakshisundaram, T.Thirunavukkarasu, State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Home Department, The Director General of Police, A.Arun, G.Karthik, A.Arun, S.Ameer ali Jinna, U.M.Avinash, R.Stephen Vinodh, S.Madhan Kumar, Chelladurai, R.Tamilselvi, J.Deepa, Manoj Kumar, G.Gopal, Manoj M.T, C.Manjula, C.Madhavi, S.Elavarasi, S.Shunmugasundaram, R.R. Venkatesan, N.Maharajan, D.Augustin, M.Ranjith, V.Dilipkumar, C.Kanagaraj, Ramakrishnan, R.Manjula Devi, P.Vijayakumar, R.Meena, K.Madhavan, S.Suresh, P.Samuthirakani, G.Gopinath, P.Ravindran, M.Jayalakshmi, V.Ananthi, R.Rajarajeswari, M.Venugopal, P.Premkumar, M.Mukunthan, D.Manojkumar, S.Sathishkumar, G.Ponthilakraj, G.Vignesh Guru, S.Mani, R.Ramachandran, P.Shanthi, S.Mohandoss, S.Kanagaraj, G.Manikumar, C.A.Kesavan, K.Karuppasamy Pandian

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Procedural History

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 filed; respondents 23-25 impleaded as per order dated 06.01.2026; respondents 26-56 impleaded as per order dated 28.01.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Payment of Wages Act Case — Bonus Not Considered Wages. The court determined that bonuses awarded by an Industrial Court do not qualify as wages under Section 2(vi) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936. 2026-11-10 10:56:18
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order in Service Transfer Dispute — Transfer on Request Cannot Be Challenged; Tribunal's Direction for Reconsideration Set Aside. 2026-11-10 10:56:16
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition murder acquittal natural justice compensation Land Acquisition burden of proof jurisdiction limitation circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Against Tribunal's Order for Appointment of Exc...

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Enforcement Directorate Actions in Multiple Writ Petitions...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Limitation Dispute Over Civil Works Contract. The Court fou...

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Employees in Public Service — Validity of...

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Process in Forest Areas While Ensuring Compliance with Fore...

Lost Your Password?