W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 AND

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment text provided only includes the case title, party names, and procedural details. No facts, legal issues, arguments, or decision are available.

Issue of Consideration

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 AND

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (07) 86

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 and C.M.P.Nos.29531, 29533, 29743 and 29744 of 2025

2026-07-09

Justice S.M.Subramaniam, Justice N.Senthilkumar

2026:MHC:2812

C.Venkatesan, M.Anbazhagan

R.Karthikeyan, V.Mariappan, K.Gopinath, G.Thayalan, M.Eranian, Meenakshisundaram, T.Thirunavukkarasu, State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Home Department, The Director General of Police, A.Arun, G.Karthik, A.Arun, S.Ameer ali Jinna, U.M.Avinash, R.Stephen Vinodh, S.Madhan Kumar, Chelladurai, R.Tamilselvi, J.Deepa, Manoj Kumar, G.Gopal, Manoj M.T, C.Manjula, C.Madhavi, S.Elavarasi, S.Shunmugasundaram, R.R. Venkatesan, N.Maharajan, D.Augustin, M.Ranjith, V.Dilipkumar, C.Kanagaraj, Ramakrishnan, R.Manjula Devi, P.Vijayakumar, R.Meena, K.Madhavan, S.Suresh, P.Samuthirakani, G.Gopinath, P.Ravindran, M.Jayalakshmi, V.Ananthi, R.Rajarajeswari, M.Venugopal, P.Premkumar, M.Mukunthan, D.Manojkumar, S.Sathishkumar, G.Ponthilakraj, G.Vignesh Guru, S.Mani, R.Ramachandran, P.Shanthi, S.Mohandoss, S.Kanagaraj, G.Manikumar, C.A.Kesavan, K.Karuppasamy Pandian

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Procedural History

W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 filed; respondents 23-25 impleaded as per order dated 06.01.2026; respondents 26-56 impleaded as per order dated 28.01.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeals in Excise Duty Matter on Medicinal Preparations: Revenue Failed to Identify Specific Narcotic Substance in Anaesthetics. Medicinal Preparations Containing Xylocaine Not Dutiable Under Section 3(1) and Schedule En...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Validity of Customs Circular Mandating BIS Certification for Alloy Steel Deformed Bars. The Circular is Challenged as Ultra Vires the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 and Violative of Fundamental Rights.