Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions in Inter Se Seniority and Head of School Appointment Dispute. Seniority determined by date of joining as Assistant Teacher, not by date of acquiring higher qualification.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Pandurang Kurhe and Namdeo Sase, both Assistant Teachers in a school run by Samta Shikshan Prasarak Mandal. The dispute revolves around inter se seniority and appointment as Head of the School. The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, passed an order on 05.01.2019 holding Kurhe senior to Sase, and on 21.01.2019 declined approval to Kurhe's appointment as Head of School. Sase challenged the seniority order, while Kurhe challenged the refusal of approval. The court noted that both petitions were interconnected and heard together. The facts reveal that Kurhe joined as Assistant Teacher on 15.06.1985, while Sase joined on 01.07.1985. The Education Officer, following directions from the High Court in W.P. No.10346/2018, determined seniority based on the date of joining as Assistant Teacher, not on the date of acquiring higher qualifications. The court upheld this determination, finding it consistent with the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Regarding the appointment as Head of School, the court found that Kurhe's appointment was made without following the prescribed procedure and without prior approval from the Education Officer, and thus the refusal of approval was justified. The court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the orders of the Education Officer.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Seniority - Inter Se Seniority of Teachers - Determination of Seniority - Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Seniority of teachers in aided schools is determined by the date of joining as Assistant Teacher, not by the date of acquiring higher qualification. The Education Officer's order dated 05.01.2019 holding Shri Kurhe senior to Shri Sase was upheld. (Paras 1-20)

B) Service Law - Appointment - Head of School - Approval of Appointment - Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - The Education Officer's order dated 21.01.2019 declining approval to Shri Kurhe's appointment as Head of School was upheld as the appointment was made without following due procedure and without prior approval. (Paras 1-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Education Officer correctly determined inter se seniority of the petitioners based on their dates of joining as Assistant Teachers, and whether the refusal to approve the appointment of Shri Kurhe as Head of School was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are dismissed. The orders of the Education Officer dated 05.01.2019 and 21.01.2019 are upheld.

Law Points

  • Seniority of teachers in aided schools is determined by the date of joining as Assistant Teacher
  • not by the date of acquiring higher qualification
  • Education Officer's order dated 05.01.2019 upheld
  • appointment as Head of School requires seniority and approval
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (02) 9

Writ Petition No.1953 of 2019 and Writ Petition No.674 of 2019

2022-02-23

A.S. Gadkari, S.G. Mehare

Mr. Vaibhav B. Dhage, Mr. Adinath B. Jagtap, Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, Dr. R.J. Godbole, Mr. S.R. Kedar

Pandurang S/o Rangnath Kurhe and Namdeo S/o Vishnu Sase

The State of Maharashtra, The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar, The President Samta Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, The Secretary Samta Shikshan Prasarak Mandal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging orders of Education Officer regarding inter se seniority and approval of appointment as Head of School.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of orders dated 05.01.2019 and 21.01.2019 passed by the Education Officer.

Filing Reason

Dispute over seniority and appointment as Head of School between two Assistant Teachers.

Previous Decisions

The High Court in W.P. No.10346/2018 directed the Education Officer to decide the seniority dispute, which resulted in the order dated 05.01.2019.

Issues

Whether the Education Officer correctly determined inter se seniority of the petitioners based on their dates of joining as Assistant Teachers? Whether the refusal to approve the appointment of Shri Kurhe as Head of School was justified?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner Sase argued that seniority should be based on date of acquiring higher qualification, not date of joining. Petitioner Kurhe argued that his appointment as Head of School should be approved as he was senior. Respondents argued that seniority is determined by date of joining as Assistant Teacher and that Kurhe's appointment was not in accordance with procedure.

Ratio Decidendi

Seniority of teachers in aided schools is determined by the date of joining as Assistant Teacher, not by the date of acquiring higher qualification. Appointment as Head of School must follow due procedure and obtain prior approval from the Education Officer.

Judgment Excerpts

The questions of inter se seniority and appointment as Head of the School have been raised in these petitions. Seniority of teachers in aided schools is determined by the date of joining as Assistant Teacher, not by the date of acquiring higher qualification.

Procedural History

The Education Officer passed order dated 05.01.2019 on seniority and order dated 21.01.2019 declining approval. Petitioners filed writ petitions challenging these orders. The High Court heard both petitions together and dismissed them on 23.02.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Caste Scrutiny Committee to Decide Caste Claim Within Three Months — Petitioner Directed to Appear Before Committee. The court issued a time-bound direction for the Committee to decide the caste claim of the petitioner, wh...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Life Convict in COVID-19 Parole Case Due to Practical Construction of Rule. Condition of Two Prior Releases Cannot Be Applied Pedantically When Purpose Was Prison Decongestion Under Rule 19(1)(C) of Maharashtra Pris...