Search Results for "Section 419 IPC"

120 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 156(3) CrPC — Dispute Civil in Nature. Agreement for Sale Not Registered, Power of Attorney Revoked, No Criminal Intent Made Out.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate, filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld as Complaint Did Not Disclose Prima Facie Case.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate, filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Former Minister in PMLA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Delay in Trial. Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Prevails Over Twin Conditions Under Section 45 PMLA Where Trial of Scheduled Offences is Unlikely to Conclude in Near Future.

The appellant, V. Senthil Balaji, a former Transport Minister of Tamil Nadu, was arrested on 14 June 2023 by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in conne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in IPC Case Despite Attempt to Travel Abroad Without Permission. Court Criticizes Police for Disregarding Judicial Orders and Imposes Additional Conditions Including Surrender of Passport and Weekly Reporting.

The petitioner, Navinchandra Gangadhar Hegde, was an accused in Crime No.177 of 2016 registered with Azad Maidan Police Station for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Alleged Maoist Members in UAP Act Case — Insufficient Evidence of Terrorist Activity. Mere Membership of Banned Organization Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Stringent Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

The judgment concerns two bail applications filed by Jyoti Babasaheb Chorge (Accused No.4) and Sushma Hemant Ramtekke (Accused No.2) in Sessions Case ...