Search Results for "Prakash Gupta"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Prakash Gupta"

772 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 772 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Pan Masala Ban Case — No Offence Under Section 328 IPC. Pan Masala Not a 'Poison' or 'Noxious Substance' Despite Ban Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

28 Oct 2005

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Piyush Kumar Gupta, and Satyanarayan Gupta, were directors of Dharampal Satyapal Limited, a company manufacturing ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

1 Apr 2015

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — Registered Proprietor's Rights Protected Against Deceptively Similar Marks. The court affirmed the trial court's order granting interim injunction restraining the defendant from using marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark 'Prem Mehandi Centre' under Sections 28, 29, 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

19 Oct 2016

The respondent/plaintiff, proprietor of 'Prem Mehandi Centre', filed two suits (Suit No. 1 of 2015 and Suit No. 2 of 2015) against the appellants/defe...

High Court

KAHC010451182019_1

14 Feb 2020

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit. Multiple Appellants Challenge Judgment in O.S. No. 1949/1980 Dismissing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession.

1 Mar 2013

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.

2 Aug 2017

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a leading manufacturer of adhesives and sealants, filed a suit against Poma-Ex Products and others for tra...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Amendments to Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Deletion of 'Trader' from Section 72 and Insertion of Rule 76-A are Unconstitutional.

12 Oct 2017

The present proceedings comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Allegation of Pushing Victim from Running Train Fails as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Contradict Prosecution Version.

12 Jan 2018

The appellants, Kanchan Deokisanjee Panpalia and Tara Harishkumar Panpalia, were convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences u...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)