WRIT PETITION NO. 2908 OF 2016
19 Jul 2016...
Search Results for "Osmanabad"
535 result(s) found
Found 535 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion Benefits to Class III Employee. Petitioner appointed as Class IV employee and later promoted to Class III entitled to salary and benefits of higher post from date of promotion.
18 Dec 2013The petitioner, Satish Shahaji Fand, was initially appointed as a Class IV employee (Parichar) with the Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. Subsequently, he wa...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Appointment as Anganwadi Sevika — Petitioner Failed to Challenge Selection Process Timely and Could Not Establish Superior Right Over Selected Candidates.
30 Apr 2015The petitioner, Shyamal W/o Santosh Musande, filed a writ petition seeking directions to appoint her as Anganwadi Karyakarti (Sevika) at Anganwadi No....
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Divisional Commissioner's Order Setting Aside Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Encroachment on Gairan Land. The Court held that encroachment on government land prior to election constitutes disqualification under Section 14(1)(j3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, and the appellate authority erred in interfering with the Collector's order.
12 Feb 2019The petitioner, Ashruba Dhondiba Gade, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, dated 14.1...
- 142
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Land Dispute Leads to Assault and Caste Abuse, but Court Finds No Prima Facie Case Under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act, 1989.
6 Nov 2019The appeal was filed by six accused persons against the order of the Sessions Court rejecting their application for pre-arrest bail in Crime No. 91 of...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Money Lending Case Due to Isolated Transaction Not Constituting Business. Single sale deed transaction between deceased parties cannot sustain prosecution under Section 39 of Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 without evidence of continuous money lending activity.
23 Sep 2024The applicant, Ratnabai Chitte, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 242...
- 1211
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Unlawful Assembly. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 149 IPC Set Aside as Common Object Not Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
5 Aug 2019The case involves appeals against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga, convicting the appellants for offences under Sections 302, 30...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Village Panchayat Members Challenging Collector's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Resolution Against Up-Sarpanch. The Court held that the Collector under Section 35(3B) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute his opinion on the validity of a no-confidence motion when the statutory procedure has been followed.
23 Sep 2016The petitioners, six members of the Village Panchayat of Wadner, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Collector, Osmanabad, dated 3rd Ju...
- 137
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Inspector in Abetment to Suicide Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Section 306 IPC. Allegations of Fabrication of Evidence Under Section 167 IPC Also Fail as No Material to Show Intent to Cause Suicide.
10 Oct 2017The applicant, Sainath Ramrao Thombre, a Police Inspector, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeki...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child below 18 years.
5 Jul 2022The appellant, Mahesh S/o Kundlik Dhavare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2015 for offences under Sect...
- 64
