Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

124 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination for APMC Election Due to Disqualification Under Section 16 of M.S. Act, 1960. Respondent No. 4 was disqualified as a defaulter of a cooperative society, yet nomination was improperly accepted.

18 Jun 2010

The petitioners, Dinkar Uttamrao Patil and Pundlik Raoji Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Administrator Under APMC Act. Petition Contends That Pending Extension Proposal, Automatic Appointment of Administrator is Impermissible Under Section 15A of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

23 Sep 2025

The Petitioners, members of the Managing Committee of the Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), filed a Writ Petition under Article 226...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for APMC Election Under Amended Ordinance. The court held that an Ordinance amending Section 13(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulations) Act, 1963, which allowed any agriculturist to contest elections even if not a voter, applied to the ongoing election process, and the rejection of the petitioner's nomination was invalid.

12 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Sow. Laxmibai Vishwanath Gaware, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her nomination form for the election to the Agricu...

High Court

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, adjudicates writ petition challenging selective acceptance of resignations of Agricultural Produce Market Committee members under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. The court examines legality of co-option of two members and subsequent notification, while respondents contend the petition became infructuous after acceptance of remaining resignations.

9 Sep 2025

This writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, arose out of a dispute concerning the Agricultural Produce Market Comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Returning Officer's Power to Delete Names from APMC Traders Constituency Voters List. Scope of Claims and Objections Under Rule 7 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Market Committee (Election to Committee) Rules, 2017, Is Limited to Omissions and Errors in Voters List, Not Substantive Inquiry into Business Activity.

27 Mar 2023

The litigation arose from elections to the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Dharangaon, specifically the traders constituency. Petitioner...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Examines Legality of Pension Recovery Conditions Imposed Post-Facto for APMC Employment. Petition Challenges Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal’s Finding that Reemployment Constituted Commercial Employment under Rule 163(8) of Pension Rules.

20 Jul 2017

The petitioner retired from the Maharashtra State Government service on 31.05.1992 and immediately joined as Secretary of the Agriculture Produce Mark...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Nomination Forms for APMC Elections — Returning Officer's Discretion Under Section 16(3) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Must Be Exercised Objectively and Not Arbitrarily.

21 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Satish Bhaskarrao Patil, filed two writ petitions challenging the rejection of his nomination forms for the election of the Agricultur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Dropping Land Acquisition Proceedings in Collusion Case — Land Reserved for Agricultural Produce Market Committee Since 1993 Cannot Be Released Without Following Statutory Procedure Under MRTP Act, 1966.

9 Dec 2016

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Anjangaon Surji, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Land Acquisition Officer, Minor ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Order Setting Aside Supersession of Market Committee. Minister's order set aside for being unreasoned and without consideration of material on record under Section 45 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Dr. Dipraj P. Ilamkar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 19.09.2018 passed by the Minister for Co-operation, Government...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Societies in Market Committee Election Process — Failure to Provide Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court quashed the inclusion of respondent societies in the electoral roll of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mantha, for want of notice and hearing, directing fresh exercise after compliance with natural justice.

28 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Kishanrao Sarjerao More, filed a writ petition challenging the inclusion of several cooperative societies in the electoral roll of the...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)