Search Results for "Grampanchayat Resolution"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Termination of Lease and Eviction Orders in MIDC Land Dispute. Lease Termination Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Comply with Conditions and Was Not Entitled to Protection Under Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955.

The petitioner, M/s. Sesa Sterlite Ltd., a Public Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order Dismissing No Confidence Motion Dispute for Lack of Hearing. Petitioner's Application Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Dismissed Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sunil Bhaskar Katkar, was elected as Sarpanch of Belati Grampanchayat in June 2015. On 3rd March 2018, respondent nos.1 to 6 filed an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Allegations of Encroachment on Government Land Led to Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3); Petitioners Argued Encroachments Were by Spouses, Not Themselves.

The petitioners were elected members of Gram Panchayat Kalamb, with petitioner no.1 elected as Sarpanch. Respondent nos.5 and 6 filed a complaint on 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Sand Ghat Allotments in Re-auction Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Hearing. The court held that cancellation of allotment without notice and hearing is arbitrary and unsustainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, five proprietors of firms, were allotted sand ghats through an auction process. However, the respondents issued a re-auction notice o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Disqualification Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Inquiry.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by members of the Gram Panchayat of village Krishna, challenging an order dated 23rd April 2010 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Sarpanch Election for Lack of Locus Standi and Alternative Remedy. Non-Voters Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Under Article 226 for Election Irregularities Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, who are residents of Bhandara district but not voters in the concerned Gram Panchayat, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...