Search Results for "Development Control Regulation"

1555 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1555 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Claim for 50% Concession on Premium Under Covid-19 Rebate Scheme — Government Resolution dated 14.01.2021 Held Applicable to Projects with Pending Premium Payments Despite Prior Commencement Certificates

The petitioner, Macrotech Developers Limited, a developer, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that it is entitled to a 50% concession on the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Road Construction in Mumbai — Environmental Clearance Upheld. Court holds that the Mumbai Coastal Road Project (South) is a public utility and the Environmental Clearance granted by SEIAA is valid under CRZ Notification, 2011, and EIA Notification, 2006.

The petitioner, Zoru Darayus Bhathena, a resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Environmental Clearance (EC) gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Notice Under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Is Required Before Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by residents of Shirdi challenging the demolition of their structures by the Shirdi Nagar Panchayat. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...