Search Results for "Ceiling"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Ceiling"

777 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 777 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Against Eviction Decree for Unlawful Subletting and Structural Alterations. Lease Deed Did Not Confer Right to Sublet Without Landlord's Consent; Subletting to Associate Companies and License to Third Party Constituted Unauthorized Subletting Under Section 108(o) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

12 Nov 2024

The case involves a dispute over the eviction of tenants from a godown in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd., owned Godown No. 63 and leased...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioner's Claim for Balance Gratuity Under VIIth Pay Commission Ceiling. Petitioner restricted claim to Rs.20 lakh ceiling, already paid Rs.9,76,280, balance Rs.10,23,720 directed to be paid with interest.

9 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Dr. Mohammad Modassir, a pensioner and former State Election Commissioner of Goa, filed a writ petition seeking payment of retirement ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Drug Price Fixation Notifications for Frusemide and Theophylline Formulations. Price Fixation Under DPCO 1995 is a Legislative Exercise and Does Not Require Individual Hearing.

15 Nov 2019

The appeals by special leave challenged the decision of the Allahabad High Court which had rejected writ petitions filed by the appellants, M/s T.C. H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Declaration That ULC Act Proceedings Lapsed Upon Repeal — Land in Village Drugdhamna Not Vested in State as Possession Not Taken Prior to Repeal Act, 1999. The court held that under Section 3 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, proceedings under the ULC Act lapse if possession of the land has not been taken before the repeal, and the land does not vest in the State.

7 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Sunilkumar Motilal Sharma, Sushilkumar Motilal Sharma, Subhashkumar Ratanlal Sharma, and the legal representatives of Smt. Sunita Ume...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Review Order in Urban Land Ceiling Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Jurisdiction Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC Cannot Be Used to Re-Examine Factual Findings Like an Appellate Court.

1 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a review order passed by the Allahabad High Court dismissing a review application filed by the original appellant, Asharfi Devi ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance with Section 41(1) Proviso and Lapse of Urban Land Ceiling Proceedings. Acquisition Notification Held Invalid as Land Already Vested in State Under Urban Land Ceiling Act Was Not Available for Acquisition Under MHADA Act.

31 Jan 2012

The case involves a challenge to the acquisition of land bearing Survey No. 113/3 and 115/6 at Solapur under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Developm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Declaration Under Ceiling Act — Petitioner's Father's Land Holding Incorrectly Calculated Due to Non-Exclusion of Irrigated Land. The court remanded the matter to the Additional Divisional Commissioner for fresh consideration with proper application of the Amended Ceiling Act provisions regarding irrigated land.

9 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Sidhling Rangnath Ghongade, a resident of Ainapurwadi, Taluka Paranda, District Osmanabad, filed a writ petition challenging the judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Reopening Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Quashed as Issued After 16 Years.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shivram A. Galbe, was a landholder in village Devegaon, Tq. Pathri, Dist. Parbhani. He filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharash...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Issued After Eight Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Tukaram S/o Gopalrao Nakate, a resident of Hadgaon, District Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Suo Moto Notice. Additional Commissioner's Power Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Not After 17 Years.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shantabai Sundarrao Deshmukh, is the legal representative of Sundarrao Rangrao Deshmukh, who died on 31.01.1989. The husband of the pe...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)