Search Results for "Building Plan Sanction"

843 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 843 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Sanction Variation of Town Planning Scheme. State Government's Refusal to Delete Internal Road Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant trust. The trust challenged an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs BBMP to Consider Apartment Owners' Complaint Against Building Licence Granted Over Common Amenity Area. Undivided Share in Entire Property Conveyed by Sale Deeds Includes Land Reserved for RWHU and STP; Builder Cannot Unilaterally Alter Approved Plan.

The petitioner, Keerthi Harmony Apartment Owners Association, challenged a building licence granted by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reconsiders Promoter's Right to Additional Construction Under MOFA After Supreme Court Remand. Dispute Centers on Whether Section 7A Overrides Flat Purchasers' Consent Requirement for Additional Wings in an Existing Scheme.

The Bombay High Court heard two first appeals remanded by the Supreme Court in a dispute between Madhuvihar Cooperative Housing Society (the society) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice under MRTP Act. Demolition Notice Quashed as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Council, Kinwat, under Section 52 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...