Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

1074 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1074 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Award Was Not in Conflict with Public Policy and Did Not Suffer from Patent Illegality.

The petitioner, Hi Style India Pvt. Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Arbitral A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Development Dispute. Court Upholds Damages for Breach but Disallows Compound Interest.

The judgment arises from two arbitration appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common order dated 25th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition and Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Objection. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is a prima facie matter at Section 11 stage, and stamp duty is for arbitrator to decide.

The Petitioner, Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award — Part I of Arbitration Act Inapplicable. Section 34 petition under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 held not maintainable for foreign award with seat in London.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's arbitration petition under section 34 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Deposit Order. The Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Joint and Several Deposit of Rs.190 Crores and Restraint on Property Alienation.

The dispute arose from a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 27 December 2012 and subsequent amendments between the Claimants (investors) and the Resp...