Search Results for "1996 Protocol"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "1996 Protocol"

85 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Liquidators Challenging Benami Act Attachment Orders, Upholds NCLAT Ruling that IBC Authorities Lack Jurisdiction to Entertain Challenges to Benami Act Orders During Insolvency Proceedings

24 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by liquidators challenging provisional attachment orders issued under the Prohibition of Be...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Reinstatement of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Proceedings — Dismissal Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. The court held that the disciplinary authority failed to provide adequate opportunity to the employee to cross-examine witnesses and that the punishment of dismissal was disproportionate to the misconduct alleged.

4 Jun 2024

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by Vijaya Bank (the employer) against an order of a learned Single Judge dated 15.10.2003 in Writ Petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on Water Sports Activities Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923 — Levy Not Ultra Vires Constitution. Court holds that water sports activities constitute 'entertainment' under Section 2(3) of the Act and that the proviso to Section 3(1) and Section 3(5A) are valid, but remits matter for determination of actual duty liability.

4 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Drishti Adventures Sports Private Ltd. and its director, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal Against Waiver of Sheriff's Poundage in Admiralty Suit — Sheriff Entitled to Poundage Even if Warrant Not Executed. Court Holds That Sheriff's Right to Poundage Accrues on Issuance of Warrant of Arrest, Not Its Execution, Under Section 48 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

6 Jul 2022

The State of Maharashtra, through the Sheriff of Mumbai, appealed against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 17th July ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Monitors Relief for Migrant Labourers During COVID-19 Lockdown — Directions Issued for Identification, Registration, and Transportation. Constitutional Duty of State to Protect Migrant Workers Under Article 21 Upheld.

5 Jun 2020

The Supreme Court of India, exercising its suo motu writ jurisdiction, took cognizance of the problems and miseries faced by migrant labourers during ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Municipal Corporation in Solid Waste Project Injunction Case — Environmental Claims Lacked Scientific Evidence. Court Restores Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit, Holding That Civil Courts Cannot Restrain Statutory Projects Based on Unsubstantiated Apprehensions.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had affirmed the decree of perman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision of Examination Order in Civil Suit — Right to Begin Evidence Not Absolute. Order 18 Rule 1 CPC permits court to direct which party shall begin, but such order can be reconsidered if circumstances change or if earlier order was passed without hearing the other side.

1 Nov 2018

The petitioners, original defendant nos.1, 2, and 3 in Regular Civil Suit No.273/2013, challenged the order dated 15.10.2018 passed by the Civil Judge...

High Court

High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Deputy Chief Minister Post as Unconstitutional. The court held that the designation of Deputy Chief Minister is not unconstitutional and is a matter of political expediency within the executive's discretion.

29 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Dr. Sekhar S. Iyer, a professor of Business Law and Management and a director at Vivekananda College, filed a public interest litigati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Sheriff's Poundage Payable on Settlement Amounts in Admiralty Suits — Admiralty Jurisdiction — Sheriff's Fees — Table of Fees under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 — Court ruled that poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released, including settlement sums, and not merely on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest, and that the Sheriff is entitled to poundage even if the suit is settled before actual sale, as the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered.

17 Jan 2018

The Bombay High Court addressed two unrelated admiralty suits tagged together to decide a common issue regarding the payment of poundage to the Sherif...

6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)