Supreme Court Monitors Relief for Migrant Labourers During COVID-19 Lockdown — Directions Issued for Identification, Registration, and Transportation. Constitutional Duty of State to Protect Migrant Workers Under Article 21 Upheld.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India, exercising its suo motu writ jurisdiction, took cognizance of the problems and miseries faced by migrant labourers during the nationwide lockdown imposed to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. The Court had earlier issued interim directions on 28.05.2020, and the present order reviews compliance by the Central Government, various States, and Union Territories. The Central Government filed an affidavit detailing measures taken, including the operation of Shramik special trains from 01.05.2020, which transported approximately 57.22 lakh migrants, and road transport for about 41 lakh workers. The Ministry of Railways committed to meeting any train demand within 24 hours. Food grains were distributed under the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana and Antyodaya Anna Yojana. The State of Maharashtra reported sending about 12 lakh migrant workers but faced allegations of inadequate food and shelter arrangements; the Court directed the State to publicize registration points and ensure proper facilities. The NCT of Delhi sent about 3 lakh workers by train and 12,000 by bus, with 6.5 lakh registrations on its web portal. The State of Gujarat sent over 14 lakh workers by train and 5.75 lakh by road, with an online portal 'Digital Gujarat' for registration. The State of Uttar Pradesh reported successfully transporting 25 lakh workers. The Court emphasized the need for vigilant and concentrated efforts by States to identify and assist all stranded migrant workers willing to return to their native places, ensuring no one is left without food or shelter. The matter was adjourned for further hearing.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Life - Article 21 - Migrant Labourers - State's duty to provide food, shelter, and transportation to stranded migrant workers during pandemic - Court reviewed compliance with interim directions and directed States to identify, register, and transport willing workers, ensuring no one is left without food or shelter (Paras 1-10).

B) Administrative Law - Implementation of Schemes - Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana - Antyodaya Anna Yojana - Central Government's obligation to provide free food grains - Court noted distribution of 5 kg per person per month for three months and directed continued compliance (Para 4).

C) Labour Law - Migrant Workers - Shramik Special Trains - Ministry of Railways - Directions to meet demand within 24 hours - Court recorded that 4228 trains had run, transporting 57.22 lakh migrants, and that no fare was charged (Paras 3-4).

D) Constitutional Law - Right to Dignity - Article 21 - State of Maharashtra - Alleged lapses in providing food and shelter - Court directed State to publicize registration points and ensure no complaints of denial of facilities (Paras 5-6).

E) Constitutional Law - Right to Livelihood - Article 21 - NCT of Delhi - Registration of workers via web portal - Court noted 6.5 lakh registrations and directed identification of willing workers for transport (Para 7).

F) Constitutional Law - Right to Life - Article 21 - State of Gujarat - Compliance with court orders - Court recorded that 14 lakh workers sent by trains, 5.75 lakh by road, and that online portal 'Digital Gujarat' was functional (Para 8).

G) Constitutional Law - Right to Life - Article 21 - State of Uttar Pradesh - Court noted 25 lakh workers had been successfully transported (Para 9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Central and State Governments have adequately addressed the problems and miseries of migrant labourers stranded due to the COVID-19 lockdown, and what further directions are necessary to ensure their welfare and safe return to native places.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed States to take more vigilant and concentrated efforts to identify stranded migrant workers willing to return, publicize registration points, ensure food and shelter, and provide transport. The Central Government was directed to continue meeting train demands within 24 hours. The matter was adjourned for further hearing.

Law Points

  • Constitutional duty of State to protect migrant workers
  • Right to life under Article 21
  • Right to livelihood
  • Right to dignity
  • Obligation to provide food and shelter
  • Non-discrimination
  • Effective implementation of government schemes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (SC) (6) 8

Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No(s).6/2020

2020-06-05

Shri Tushar Mehta, Shri Kapil Sibal, Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Smt. Indira Jaising, Shri K.V. Vishwanathan, Shri Colin Gonsalves, Shri Jaideep Gupta, Shri Chitnis, Shri Sanjay Jain, Shri Maninder Singh, Shri P.S. Narsimha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Suo motu writ petition concerning problems and miseries of migrant labourers during COVID-19 lockdown.

Remedy Sought

Directions to Central and State Governments to ensure welfare, identification, registration, and transportation of stranded migrant workers.

Filing Reason

Court took suo motu cognizance of the plight of migrant labourers during the nationwide lockdown.

Previous Decisions

Interim directions issued on 28.05.2020; compliance reviewed in this order.

Issues

Whether the Central and State Governments have adequately addressed the problems of migrant labourers during the lockdown. What further directions are necessary to ensure their welfare and safe return.

Submissions/Arguments

Central Government submitted that Shramik trains and road transport were arranged, food grains distributed, and demand for trains would be met within 24 hours. State of Maharashtra submitted that 12 lakh workers were sent, but intervenors alleged lapses in food and shelter. NCT of Delhi submitted that 3 lakh workers were sent by train and 12,000 by bus, with 6.5 lakh registrations. State of Gujarat submitted that 14 lakh workers were sent by train and 5.75 lakh by road, with an online portal for registration. State of Uttar Pradesh submitted that 25 lakh workers were successfully transported.

Ratio Decidendi

The State has a constitutional duty under Article 21 to protect the right to life and dignity of migrant labourers, including providing food, shelter, and transportation during a pandemic. Compliance with court directions must be effective and not merely on paper.

Judgment Excerpts

We are of the view that State has to take a more vigilant and concentrated effort in identifying the migrant workers, who are still stranded in State of Maharashtra and who are willing to return to their native places. The Government should publicise and announce the places i.e police stations or any other suitable place for identifying/registering the workers, who have not yet been provided any train or bus journey.

Procedural History

The Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of the problems of migrant labourers during the COVID-19 lockdown. On 28.05.2020, interim directions were issued. The present order reviews compliance by the Central Government, States, and Union Territories based on affidavits and reports filed.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Monitors Relief for Migrant Labourers During COVID-19 Lockdown — Directions Issued for Identification, Registration, and Transportation. Constitutional Duty of State to Protect Migrant Workers Under Article 21 Upheld.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Interpretation of "Change in Law" in Mega Power Policy. Defining the implications of policy modifications for Mega Power Projects under competitive bidding framework.