Bombay High Court Holds Sheriff's Poundage Payable on Settlement Amounts in Admiralty Suits — Admiralty Jurisdiction — Sheriff's Fees — Table of Fees under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 — Court ruled that poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released, including settlement sums, and not merely on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest, and that the Sheriff is entitled to poundage even if the suit is settled before actual sale, as the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 133
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court addressed two unrelated admiralty suits tagged together to decide a common issue regarding the payment of poundage to the Sheriff of Mumbai. The plaintiff in Commercial Suit No. 816 of 2017, Sinica Graeca Shipping Limited, had arrested the vessel M.T. Chemroad Mega, and the suit was settled for USD 1,200,000. The plaintiff sought to pay poundage only on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest (USD 1,000,000), while the Sheriff claimed poundage on the settlement amount of USD 1,200,000. Similarly, in Commercial Suit No. 98 of 2015, North Star Marine Limited had arrested the vessel M.V. Xing An Da, and the suit was settled for USD 1,000,000, with the plaintiff offering to pay poundage on USD 500,000 (the value of the vessel as per the warrant), but the Sheriff claimed on the settlement amount. The Court framed the issue as whether poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released (including settlement sums) or only on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest, and whether poundage is payable even if the suit is settled before actual sale. The Court analyzed the Table of Fees under the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, and relevant precedents, including the English practice and Indian decisions. The Court held that the Sheriff is entitled to poundage on the amount for which the vessel is released, as the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered, and poundage is earned at the time of arrest or release, not only upon sale. The Court also held that poundage is calculated on the amount of the claim or the value of the property, whichever is less, but if the vessel is released on payment of a sum, poundage is on that sum. The Court directed that in both suits, poundage be paid on the settlement amounts, and the Sheriff's bills be recalculated accordingly. The Court also clarified that the Sheriff is entitled to poundage even if the suit is settled before sale, as the Sheriff has already performed the services.

Headnote

A) Admiralty Jurisdiction - Sheriff's Poundage - Table of Fees - Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - The issue was whether poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released (including settlement sums) or only on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest. The Court held that poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released, as the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered, and the Table of Fees applies to admiralty suits. (Paras 1-22)

B) Admiralty Jurisdiction - Sheriff's Poundage - Settlement Before Sale - The issue was whether the Sheriff is entitled to poundage even if the suit is settled before actual sale of the vessel. The Court held that the Sheriff is entitled to poundage because the Sheriff has already performed the services of arrest and custody, and poundage is earned at the time of arrest or release, not only upon sale. (Paras 1-22)

C) Admiralty Jurisdiction - Calculation of Poundage - The issue was how poundage is calculated. The Court held that poundage is calculated on the amount of the claim or the value of the property, whichever is less, but if the vessel is released on payment of a sum, poundage is on that sum. The Table of Fees under the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 provides for a sliding scale. (Paras 1-22)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Sheriff of Mumbai is entitled to poundage on the amount for which the vessel is released (including settlement amounts) or only on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest, and whether poundage is payable even if the suit is settled before actual sale of the vessel.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court held that the Sheriff is entitled to poundage on the amount for which the vessel is released, including settlement amounts, and that poundage is payable even if the suit is settled before actual sale. The Court directed that in both suits, poundage be paid on the settlement amounts, and the Sheriff's bills be recalculated accordingly.

Law Points

  • Sheriff's poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released
  • including settlement amounts
  • not merely on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest
  • Sheriff is entitled to poundage even if the suit is settled before actual sale
  • Table of Fees under Bombay Court Fees Act
  • 1959 applies to admiralty suits
  • poundage is calculated on the amount of the claim or the value of the property
  • whichever is less
  • but if the vessel is released on payment of a sum
  • poundage is on that sum
  • the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered and poundage is earned even if the vessel is not sold.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (01) 177

Commercial Suit No. 816 of 2017 and Commercial Suit No. 98 of 2015

2018-01-17

K.R. Shriram, J.

2017:BHC-OS:14318

Mr. R.V. Narichania, senior advocate a/w. Mr. Arjun Mittal and Mr. Ruchir Goenka i/b. Bose and Mitra and Co. for plaintiff in COMS/816/2017; Ms. P.H. Kantharia, Government Pleader a/w. Ms. Deepali Patankar, Honorary Assistant to the Government Pleader for office of the Deputy of Sheriff of Mumbai in COMS/816/2017; Mr. Prasad Shenoy a/w. Mr. Aman Rungta i/b. Crawford Bayley and Co. for plaintiff in COMS/98/2015; None for defendants in COMS/98/2015; Mr. S.D. Chitgopikar, Deputy Sheriff of Mumbai present.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Two unrelated admiralty suits tagged together to decide the issue of payment of poundage to the Sheriff of Mumbai.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiffs sought to pay poundage only on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest, while the Sheriff claimed poundage on the settlement amounts.

Filing Reason

Dispute regarding the calculation of poundage payable to the Sheriff upon release of arrested vessels after settlement.

Issues

Whether the Sheriff of Mumbai is entitled to poundage on the amount for which the vessel is released (including settlement amounts) or only on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest. Whether poundage is payable even if the suit is settled before actual sale of the vessel.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiffs argued that poundage should be calculated on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest, not on the settlement amount. Sheriff argued that poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released, including settlement sums, and that poundage is earned even if the vessel is not sold.

Ratio Decidendi

The Sheriff's poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released, as the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered, and the Table of Fees under the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 applies to admiralty suits. Poundage is earned at the time of arrest or release, not only upon sale, and is calculated on the amount of the claim or the value of the property, whichever is less, but if the vessel is released on payment of a sum, poundage is on that sum.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue relates to payment of poundage to the Sheriff of Mumbai under the table of fees which arises time and again in admiralty suits. The Sheriff is entitled to poundage on the amount for which the vessel is released, as the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959: Table of Fees
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Attachment Warrant in NI Act Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with Section 82 CrPC. Attachment order under Section 83 CrPC set aside as the Magistrate failed to record satisfaction that accused had absc...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Decree in Arbitration Award Dispute, Upholding Validity of Arbitration Agreement and Stamped Award. Specific Ad Hoc Authorisation by Secretary Satisfied Section 175(3) of Government of India Act, 1935, a...