Search Results for "notice before demolition"

891 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 891 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Co-operative Society's Writ Petitions Against Unauthorized Construction by Members. Dispute Between Society and Member Regarding Unauthorized Construction and Possession is Barred from Civil Court Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, The Manglorian Garden Homes Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed three writ petitions challenging the orders of the Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Office Memorandum Allowing Post Facto CRZ Clearance for Permissible Activities. Environmental Organization Contended That the 2021 Circular Contravenes Mandatory Prior Clearance Requirement Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

The present Public Interest Litigation invoked the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Lock and Seal Notice in Unauthorised Construction Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 56(2A) of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Notice Must Specify Time for Compliance Before Locking and Sealing; Failure to Do So Renders Notice Invalid.

The petitioner, R. Ashokan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 24.10.2025 issued by the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Maintainability of Civil Suit for Declaration of Ownership. Trial Court's Decision on Preliminary Issue Upheld as It Involves Mixed Questions of Law and Fact Not Amenable to Summary Adjudication.

The Union of India, through the Deputy Salt Commissioner, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order for Unauthorized Construction by MHADA Tenant. Petitioner failed to prove that construction was within plot boundary or that MHADA lacked jurisdiction under Section 66 of MHADA Act, 1976.

The petitioner, Maniram Satyanarayan Chaudhari, was allotted a tenement by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board (MHADA) on 19th November...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Contempt Order Against Appellant for Willful Disobedience of Injunction in Property Suit. Civil imprisonment of two months confirmed for violating ad-interim injunction granted under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC.

The Appellant, Ramchandra Bihari Yadav, was the defendant in S.C. Suit No. 1379 of 1991 filed by the Respondent, The Zoroastrial Radih Society. On 28t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notice for Unauthorized Commercial Construction Under Section 260(1) of MMC Act. Petitioner failed to produce any construction permission or approved plans for hotel, bakery, and other commercial units, leading to dismissal of writ petition.

The petitioner, Sakib Ayub Khan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 21 February 2023 issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners without ouster or denial of title.

The case involves a partition suit filed by three sisters (respondents) against their two brothers (appellants) seeking partition and separate possess...