Search Results for "Temple Dispute"

1409 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1409 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Despite Completion of Work. Clause 21 of Agreement dated 05/09/1988 constitutes valid arbitration agreement under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Srinivasa Construction (a registered partnership firm) and its partners, filed a petition under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Case Due to Amicable Settlement Between Parties. Court quashes FIR under Sections 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 IPC as parties have resolved their differences and entered into consent terms.

The petitioners, Sandip Sarjerao Sule (husband), Suman Sarjerao Sule (mother-in-law), and Sunita Prakash Kale (sister-in-law), filed a criminal writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Case Due to Amicable Settlement. Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Sections 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 IPC as Parties Have Resolved Differences and Consent Terms Filed.

The petitioners, who are the husband, mother-in-law, and sister-in-law of the respondent No. 2 (the complainant), filed a criminal writ petition seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Contract in Municipal Tender Dispute — Unilateral Termination Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Contract Termination Set Aside as Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., a partnership firm, was awarded a contract by the Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council for a projec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Share Dispute Due to Civil Nature. Dispute over share purchase agreement held to be purely contractual, not constituting criminal breach of trust or cheating under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC.

The petitioners, Rohan Dukle and Sudhir Gudal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's finding of breach of contract and award of damages upheld as not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, through the General Manager of Western Railway, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The appellant, M/s. Shree Garodi Steels, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, M/s. Yojaka India Private Ltd., in O.S. No. 739...