Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Case Due to Amicable Settlement Between Parties. Court quashes FIR under Sections 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 IPC as parties have resolved their differences and entered into consent terms.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Sandip Sarjerao Sule (husband), Suman Sarjerao Sule (mother-in-law), and Sunita Prakash Kale (sister-in-law), filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of FIR No. 1242/2018 registered at Hadapsar Police Station, Pune, for offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR was lodged by respondent No. 2, Priyanka Sandip Sule (wife), due to marital discord. The parties had been married on 21st May 2010 and had a child aged 9 years. After the FIR, a charge-sheet was filed. Subsequently, the parties amicably settled their dispute and entered into consent terms. The petitioners, therefore, sought quashing of the FIR on the ground of settlement. The court, after hearing the parties and perusing the consent terms, noted that the dispute was personal in nature and the parties had resolved their differences. The court held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law and accordingly quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings. The petition was allowed, and rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - Settlement between parties - Sections 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 IPC - Petitioners sought quashing of FIR on ground of amicable settlement with respondent No.2 - Court allowed quashing as parties had resolved their differences and entered into consent terms - Held that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law (Paras 3-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered for offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code can be quashed on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. FIR bearing C.R. No. 1242/2018 registered with Hadapsar Police Station, Pune, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and all consequential proceedings are quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Compounding of offences
  • Settlement in matrimonial disputes
  • Section 498A IPC
  • Section 323 IPC
  • Section 504 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (09) 37

Criminal Writ Petition No. 3236 of 2022

2022-09-23

Revati Mohite Dere, Prithviraj K. Chavan

Datta Mane for the Petitioners, J. P. Yagnik (A.P.P) for Respondent No.1-State, Akash Yadav for Respondent No. 2

Sandip Sarjerao Sule, Suman Sarjerao Sule, Sunita Prakash Kale

The State of Maharashtra, Priyanka Sandip Sule

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 1242/2018 and all consequential proceedings

Filing Reason

Amicable settlement between the parties

Previous Decisions

Charge-sheet was filed after investigation

Issues

Whether the FIR can be quashed on the basis of settlement between the parties

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the dispute has been amicably settled and consent terms have been entered into. Respondent No. 2 did not oppose the quashing.

Ratio Decidendi

When parties in a matrimonial dispute have amicably settled their differences and entered into consent terms, continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, and the FIR can be quashed to secure the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR bearing C.R. No. 1242/2018 registered with the Hadapsar Police Station, Pune, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code (`IPC’). Perused the papers. The petitioner No. 1 is the husband of respondent No.2 and petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are the mother and sister-in-law respectively of the respondent No. 2. As there were marital issues and discord between the parties, the respondent No. 2 lodged the aforesaid FIR bearing C.R. No. 1242/2018 with the Hadapsar Police Station, Pune.

Procedural History

FIR No. 1242/2018 was registered at Hadapsar Police Station, Pune. After investigation, charge-sheet was filed. The petitioners then filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 3236 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of the FIR on the ground of settlement.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 498A, 323, 504, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision Allowing Interest Deduction Under Section 36(1)(iii) for Dealer in Shares. Interest on Borrowed Funds for Investment in Shares Held as Stock-in-Trade is Business Expenditure, Not to be Reduced from Divide...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Case Due to Amicable Settlement Between Parties. Court quashes FIR under Sections 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 IPC as parties have resolved their differences and entered into consent terms.