Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

1901 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1901 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Development Plan Reservation — Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Landowners Entitled to Develop Lands as Acquisition Not Completed Within Ten Years.

The petitioners, owners of lands bearing Survey Nos. 103 and 104 at Kopargaon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Plaintiff in Suit for Declaration and Possession — Agreement for Sale Terminated Due to Dishonoured Post-Dated Cheques. Defendants' Claim of Protected Tenancy and Part Performance Rejected as They Failed to Pay Balance Consideration.

The suit pertained to an agreement for sale of a flat and garage at 'Asha Mahal', Pedder Road, Bombay. The plaintiff, Yuvrani Hansa Devi, had initiall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Title Dispute — Res Judicata Not Applicable as Earlier Suit Was Only for Injunction, Not Title. Former Students' Suit in Representative Capacity for Declaration of Government Ownership Maintainable Despite Earlier Injunction Decree.

The dispute pertains to a suit property bearing Sy.No.81 of Tumkur, originally belonging to Syed Md. Bokhari and Lankey. Due to non-payment of arrears...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Filed Against Trial Court Judgments in Property Dispute. Appeals Challenge Dismissal of Declaration Suit and Decree of Partition Suit Based on Conflicting Gift Deeds and Succession Claims.

The High Court of Karnataka took up two Regular First Appeals (RFA No.1285/2008 and RFA No.731/2014) for common disposal, arising from two original ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Consent Terms Not Binding on Applicants Under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC. Court holds that applicants who were not parties to consent terms are entitled to restoration of possession or alternative accommodation.

The case involves an appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against an order of a learned single Judge in a Chamber Summons taken out by Responde...