Search Results for "oral evidence exclusion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "oral evidence exclusion"

799 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 799 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

18 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Award Upheld. Joint liability of insurer and owners for injuries caused by rash and negligent driving of tractor and trolly under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

3 Dec 2013

The appellant, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, challenged the judgment and award dated 22.8.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Insolvency Notice in Debt Recovery Matter — Debt Recovery Tribunal's Decree Constitutes a Final Judgment Under Section 9(2) of Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

3 Apr 2006

The judgment debtor, Deepak Cochhar and another, filed a notice of motion seeking to set aside Insolvency Notice No. N/72 of 2004 issued by the Insolv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Computation of 30 Days Under Section 31(2) of MRTU & PULP Act Excludes Date of Dismissal and Includes Public Holiday. The court held that the Industrial Court erred in including the date of dismissal and treating the period as a calendar month.

11 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Popat Anaji Rautray, filed a complaint (ULP No.234 of 2000) before the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar, alleging unfair labour practices....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

11 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Petition Challenging Compassionate Appointment to Sons of Deceased Daily Wagers. Delay in Application Not Fatal When Policy Does Not Prescribe Limitation Period.

26 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Mahatma Phule Krushi Vidyapeeth, challenged the order of the Industrial Court which directed it to consider the applications of Nanasa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of Delay in Gratuity Appeal — Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Section 7(7) First Proviso Imposes Absolute Bar on Entertaining Appeal Filed After 120 Days from Receipt of Controlling Authority's Order.

5 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Changunabai Sambhaji Gaware, a retired employee, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court dated 18.11.2014,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Employee in Gratuity Case — Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Industrial Court's Order Allowing Condonation of Delay Set Aside as Appeal Was Filed Beyond the Maximum Period of 120 Days Prescribed Under Section 7(7) First Proviso.

5 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Changunabai Sambhaji Gaware, an employee, was aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 18.11.2014 passed by the Industrial Court unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Domestic Violence Proceedings Against Husband and In-laws Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Complaint Filed at Pune While Shared Household Was in Hyderabad — Held That Jurisdiction Lies Where Cause of Action Arises, Not at Wife's Temporary Residence.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioners, the husband and his parents, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the proceedings initiat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Domestic Violence Proceedings — Maintainability of Application Under Section 12 of DV Act Against Husband and In-Laws Upheld Despite Lack of Shared Household. The Court held that the wife's right to reside in a shared household is not contingent on her actual residence at the time of filing the application, and the Magistrate has jurisdiction to grant reliefs under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

2 Mar 2016

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the husband and his parents seeking quashing of proceedings initiated by the wife under Secti...

76 77 78 79 80

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)