Search Results for "omissions not proved"

1502 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1502 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 31.05...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convicted Offender in Murder Case Due to Unsoundness of Mind Under Section 84 IPC. Appellant's act of killing brother and injuring another held to be act of person incapable of knowing nature of act by reason of unsoundness of mind.

The appellant, Rajendra Adakuji Choudhary, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No.84/2014 for offenses under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Udal Harishchandra Nanak, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree on Admission in Construction Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Claim Amount Based on Defendant's Admissions. Unequivocal Admission of Liability Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Leads to Decree for Final Bill Amount with Interest.

The plaintiff, a partnership firm, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,07,88,000/- with interest against the defendant, a government-owned company, for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Culpable Homicide in Wife's Burn Death. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC for causing death of wife by burns, with knowledge that act was likely to cause death, but without intention to cause death.

The appellant, Francis Devid Batise, was prosecuted along with his mother and another person for the death of his wife Sheela, who sustained burn inju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 326 and 307 read with Section 149 IPC. Accused No.3 Challenges Conviction and Sentence Imposed by Assistant Sessions Court, Perumbavoor, in SC No.1141 of 2018.

The appeal arose from a criminal trial before the Assistant Sessions Court, Perumbavoor, in S.C.No.1141/2018, where accused No.3 was convicted for off...