Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Culpable Homicide in Wife's Burn Death. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC for causing death of wife by burns, with knowledge that act was likely to cause death, but without intention to cause death.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 74
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Francis Devid Batise, was prosecuted along with his mother and another person for the death of his wife Sheela, who sustained burn injuries on 5 November 2006 and died on 7 November 2006. The prosecution alleged that the appellant and his mother subjected Sheela to cruelty for a demand of Rs. 1 lakh for purchasing an autorickshaw, and on the day of the incident, the appellant came home drunk and abused Sheela, leading to her sustaining burns. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) and sentenced him to seven years' rigorous imprisonment, while acquitting him of other offences and acquitting the other accused. The appellant appealed against the conviction. The High Court examined the evidence, including the dying declaration and testimony of witnesses. The court found that the appellant had knowledge that his act of setting Sheela on fire was likely to cause death, but there was no intention to cause death. Therefore, the conviction under Section 304 Part II was upheld. The court also noted that the sentence of seven years was appropriate given the circumstances. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder - Section 304 Part II IPC - The appellant was convicted for causing the death of his wife by burns, but the court found no intention to cause death, only knowledge that the act was likely to cause death. The conviction under Section 302 IPC was not sustainable. (Paras 1-2)

B) Criminal Law - Cruelty by Husband - Section 498-A IPC - The appellant was acquitted of cruelty charges as the evidence regarding demand of dowry and ill-treatment was not sufficient to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 2)

C) Criminal Law - Common Intention - Section 34 IPC - The other accused were acquitted as there was no evidence of common intention to cause death. (Para 2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 304 Part II of IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC are confirmed.

Law Points

  • Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Dowry Death
  • Section 498-A IPC
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 504 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (03) 34

Criminal Appeal No. 603 of 2011

2012-03-27

A. M. Thipsay

Mr. N. S. Ghanekar for appellant, Mr. N. R. Shaikh APP for State

Francis Devid Batise

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by Sessions Judge for causing death of his wife by burns.

Previous Decisions

Sessions Judge convicted appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced to 7 years RI; acquitted of other offences and acquitted co-accused.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. State argued that the dying declaration and other evidence supported the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant had knowledge that his act of setting his wife on fire was likely to cause death, but there was no intention to cause death, thus the offence falls under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant and two others were prosecuted on the allegation of having committed offences punishable under Sections 302,498-A & 504 of the Indian Penal Code r/w Section 34 of the IPC. The learned Sessions Judge found the appellant guilty of an offence punishable under Section 304 (Part II) of IPC and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years.

Procedural History

The appellant was tried by Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC, and sentenced to 7 years RI. He appealed to the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 304 Part II, 498-A, 504, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Culpable Homicide in Wife's Burn Death. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC for causing death of wife by burns, with knowledge that act was likely to cause death, but without intention...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Quashing of FIR and Criminal Proceedings Under Section 482 CrPC. High Court's Order Quashing FIR and Proceedings Upheld as Supreme Court Found No Reason to Interfere After Hearing Submissions and...