Search Results for "Section 2(54)"

967 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 967 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Remand to Appellate Court in Rent Control Eviction Case — Right of Appeal Not Violated. Partial Eviction Requirement Under Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Must Be Considered by Appellate Court.

The appellant, Ramesh Danchand Waswani, a tenant of premises owned by respondent Yusufbhai Mukhtar Amir Varawalla, faced eviction proceedings under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition Alleging Scandalizing of Lower Court. Use of Words 'Extraneous Considerations' in Review Application Held Not to Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Col. Mahendra Pratap Choudhary, filed a criminal contempt petition under Section 15 read with Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Questions on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for Direct Recruitment as District Judges to Constitution Bench — Interpretation of Article 233(2) of Constitution of India, 1950 Regarding Requirement of Continuous Practice as Advocate.

The Supreme Court, in a reference by a three-Judge Bench, examined substantial questions of law concerning the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Requiring Individual Flat Owners to Deposit Entire Building's Property Tax for Appeal. Small Causes Court Order Set Aside as Condition of Depositing Tax for Whole Building is Harsh and Inequitable.

The petitioners, owners of five premises in Maker Chamber V, Nariman Point, Mumbai, challenged an order of the Small Causes Court that required them t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...