Search Results for "oral evidence exclusion"

801 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 801 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Objections to Nomination in Cooperative Society Elections. Held that the Returning Officer must decide objections on merits and cannot reject them on the ground that the objector is not a candidate.

The petitioner, Shivaji Bapurao Raut, a member of the Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha Marya., Ardhamasala, challenged the rejection of his obje...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case but Reduces Compensation Amount. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs. 7,10,000 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sentence reduced from Rs. 7,10,000 to Rs. 4,70,000.

The petitioner, M/s. Banavathy & Company, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. against the judgment date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order to Deposit Half of Asset Value in Inventory Proceedings — Jurisdictional Error by Trial Court in Directing Deposit Without Deciding Ownership Claim Under Article 1383 of Portuguese Civil Procedure Code

The appeal arises from an order dated 16th August 2008 passed by the IIIrd Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Margao, in Inventory Proceedings N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Canceling Cinema License for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Speaking Order. Appellate Authority Under Section 8A of Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Cannot Cancel License Without Recording Findings on Grounds Under Section 6.

The petitioners, Deepak Joshi and the legal representatives of Ravi K. Appu, challenged an order dated 28.01.1999 passed by the State Minister (Home),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition Alleging Double Jeopardy for Parole Overstay. Non-appointment as Night Watchman is not a punishment but a discretionary privilege, and remission cut is a valid disciplinary measure.

The petitioner, Imran Khan Sardar Khan, a convict lodged in Central Prison, Nagpur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition alleging double jeopardy. He was re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition Alleging Double Jeopardy in Prison Punishment and Transfer. Transfer of prisoner to Special Prison does not require prior court approval and forfeiture of remission for misconduct is not double jeopardy.

The petitioner, Niyaj Ahamad Abdul Jabbar, a convict lodged in Open Prison, Morshi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Over Cooperative Credit Societies. Members of Managing Committees Cannot Claim Immunity from Consumer Forum Orders as Cooperative Credit Societies Provide Services for Remuneration.

This group of writ petitions was filed by members of managing committees of cooperative credit societies challenging the jurisdiction of the District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Involving Beer Labels. Plaintiff's mark 'HAYWARDS 5000' held to be infringed by defendant's use of '5000' in similar label, as numeral is an essential feature not descriptive of beer strength.

The plaintiff, Skol Breweries Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Som Distilleries & Breweries Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 34 Petition Despite Arbitration at Calcutta Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses. Parties Bound by Agreement Conferring Exclusive Jurisdiction on Mumbai Courts Over All Disputes.

The petitioner, ISE Securities & Services Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...