Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Objections to Nomination in Cooperative Society Elections. Held that the Returning Officer must decide objections on merits and cannot reject them on the ground that the objector is not a candidate.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shivaji Bapurao Raut, a member of the Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha Marya., Ardhamasala, challenged the rejection of his objections to the acceptance of nominations of respondent no.3 in three separate writ petitions (Writ Petition Nos. 10458, 10460, and 10461 of 2022). The election for the Managing Committee of the society was declared on 27.09.2022. The petitioner and respondent no.3 were both members of the society. The petitioner filed objections against the nomination of respondent no.3, but the Returning Officer rejected those objections without considering their merits, stating that the petitioner was not a candidate. The petitioner sought to quash the rejection and direct the Returning Officer to decide the objections on merits. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the Returning Officer's action was arbitrary and unsustainable. The court set aside the rejection and directed the Returning Officer to decide the objections on merits within two weeks. The court also clarified that the election process could continue but the result would be subject to the outcome of the objections.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies - Election - Nomination Objections - Returning Officer's Duty - The Returning Officer must decide objections to nomination on merits and cannot reject them solely on the ground that the objector is not a candidate. The court held that the Returning Officer's action in rejecting the objection without considering its merits was arbitrary and unsustainable. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Returning Officer is justified in rejecting the petitioner's objection to the acceptance of nomination of respondent no.3 without considering the merits of the objection.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the rejection of objections, and directed the Returning Officer to decide the objections on merits within two weeks. The election process may continue but the result will be subject to the outcome of the objections.

Law Points

  • Election law
  • Cooperative societies
  • Nomination objections
  • Returning Officer's duty
  • Merits-based decision
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (10) 18

Writ Petition No.10458 of 2022, Writ Petition No.10460 of 2022, Writ Petition No.10461 of 2022

2022-10-11

Sandeep V. Marne, J.

Mr. Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi (for petitioners), Mr. V.H. Dighe (for respondent no.1)

Shivaji Bapurao Raut

The Returning Officer, Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha Marya., Ardhamasala, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging rejection of objections to acceptance of nominations in cooperative society elections.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the rejection of objections and direction to the Returning Officer to decide the objections on merits.

Filing Reason

The Returning Officer rejected the petitioner's objections to the nomination of respondent no.3 without considering the merits, stating that the petitioner was not a candidate.

Previous Decisions

The Returning Officer rejected the objections without considering merits.

Issues

Whether the Returning Officer is justified in rejecting the petitioner's objection to the acceptance of nomination of respondent no.3 without considering the merits of the objection.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the Returning Officer arbitrarily rejected the objections without considering their merits. The respondent no.1 submitted that the objections were rejected as the petitioner was not a candidate.

Ratio Decidendi

The Returning Officer must decide objections to nomination on merits and cannot reject them solely on the ground that the objector is not a candidate.

Judgment Excerpts

The Returning Officer has rejected the objection without considering the merits of the objection. The action of the Returning Officer in rejecting the objection without considering its merits is arbitrary and unsustainable.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed objections to the nomination of respondent no.3. The Returning Officer rejected the objections. The petitioner then filed writ petitions before the High Court.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Notices Issued Beyond Four Years Without Fresh Material Held Invalid.