Search Results for "affidavit validity"

3329 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3329 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Superintendent and Section Officer Employees Challenging Deemed Date of Promotion. Deemed Date of Promotion Must Be from Date of Promotion Order, Not from Date of Caste Validity Certificate, When Employees Not Responsible for Delay.

The petitioners, Ashok Wankar, Pramod Gargilwar, Chhatrapati Sonule, and Kishor Lakde, were employees of Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur, holding posts of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Non-Payment and Failure to Issue Taking Over Certificate. Court holds that disputes regarding interim payment certificates and issuance of TOC are arbitrable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicants, BSI-JDN Joint Venture and others, filed four applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty Rate on Cranes — Enacted Statute Prevails Over Discrepancy in Bill Versions. Rate of Duty Under Heading 84.26 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is 15% Ad Valorem, Not 12% as Claimed by Manufacturer.

The petitioner, M/s. Garlick Engineering, a manufacturer of cranes, filed a writ petition challenging the rate of central excise duty applicable to cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Maharashtra Municipal Amendment Ordinances and Act; Petitioners Allege Violation of Article 213. Court Examines Urgency and Legislative Process for Promulgation of Ordinance No. IX and XVI of 2016 and Act IX of 2017.

Three writ petitions were filed before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of Maharashtra Ordinances and an Act that am...