Search Results for "Binding Agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Binding Agreement"

3809 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3809 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Special Land Acquisition Officer to Determine Compensation for Land Acquired for Agricultural Produce Market Committee Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Compromise Terms Binding on Parties. The court held that the SLAO must pass a fresh award as per the compromise recorded in Writ Petition No. 2285 of 1992, failing which the petitioners could seek additional compensation in civil court.

19 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Radhabai wd/o Purushottam Mallawat and Ashish s/o Purushottam Mallawat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

1 Jan 1970

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal in Partition Suit Based on Res Judicata and Invalid Will. The suit was barred under Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as prior litigation had conclusively established a valid partition in 1964, extinguishing the testator's ownership rights and rendering the will ineffective.

27 Jan 2022

The dispute originated from a partition suit filed by the plaintiff, who claimed a one-fourth share in joint family properties based on a will execute...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Service of notice by speed post or courier must be proved by cogent evidence; mere dispatch is insufficient.

8 Mar 2023

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of petitions and applications under Section 482 CrPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Dispute Resolution Clause Providing for Commissioner's Decision and Government Appeal. Clause 16 of Agreement Stating Governance by Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Constitutes Arbitration Agreement, and Withdrawal of Previously Constituted Tribunal Due to Allegations Necessitates Fresh Appointment.

3 Aug 2010

The applicant, Shri Sai Trading Company, a partnership firm, entered into an agreement dated 27th April 2006 with the respondent, Sangli Miraj & Kupwa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to MOFA Amendments and Upholds Conveyance Order — Amendments to Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 by Act No.4 of 2008 are intra vires and Competent Authority's order directing conveyance is valid as promoter failed to execute conveyance within statutory period.

17 Oct 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Siddharth Construction, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Maharashtra Ow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Unstamped MOU. Stamp Objection Is for Arbitral Tribunal to Decide, Not a Bar to Appointment of Arbitrator.

22 Aug 2014

The applicants, Nilesh Shantilal Tank and Praful Shantilal Tank, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, 1996, Setting Aside Part of Arbitral Award for Being Contrary to Public Policy. Court holds that arbitrator cannot award interest on interest (compound interest) unless specifically agreed, and that claims barred by limitation cannot be awarded.

29 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyagor, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitra...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award and District Court Order in Partnership Dispute. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappreciation under Section 34 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

2 Apr 2026

The appellants, M. Mallikarjuna and Smt. Rajeshwari Mallikarjuna, filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Cross Suits Involving Dispute Over Conveyance and Development Rights Under MOFA — Interim Injunctions Sought by Both Developer and Federation. Core Issue Concerns Whether Entire Land of a Layout Was to Be Conveyed to Federation, Precluding Developer from Completing Sanctioned Construction on Part of Land.

4 Nov 2025

The dispute concerns a layout development in Mulund (East), Mumbai, where Acme Enterprises (the Developer) claimed development rights over a larger pl...

75 76 77 78 79

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)