Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1548 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1548 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Mandatory Time Limit Under NSEIL Byelaws. Award passed beyond six-month period without extension provision is illegal and liable to be quashed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 19 September 2009 passed by a panel of Arbitrators appointed under the Byelaws, Rule...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal, Sets Aside Remand Order: Limitation for Section 34 Application Runs from Service of True Copy of Award, Not from Unsigned Original. Party Serving Certified True Copy Cannot Later Challenge Award's Validity on Ground of Lack of Signatures.

The appellant, Ramdeobaba Charitable Society, challenged an order of the Principal District Judge dated 22 September 2016, which condoned the delay in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration Dispute Over Charter Hire Agreement. Respondent Waived 60-Day Notice Requirement by Not Objecting to Invocation of Arbitration.

The applicant, Transocean Drilling Services (India) Pvt. Ltd., and the respondent, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., entered into an agreement on 24...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Court upholds Section 34 order remanding matter for fresh consideration due to misclassification of land and need for evidence.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by M/s. Agrawal Foodstuff LLP against an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Based on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator. Unilateral Appointment Does Not Violate Section 12(5) Read with Seventh Schedule When Arbitrator Not Disqualified and Objection Waived by Participation.

The petitioners, Hanuman Motors Pvt. Ltd. and another, challenged an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator appointed by the respondent, M/s. Tata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions Against Rejection of Plaint in Arbitration-Related Suits. Court holds that bar under Section 5 of the Arbitration Act does not apply to suits challenging arbitral awards on grounds of fraud and jurisdictional error.

The case involves two civil revision petitions filed by M/s. Associated Constructions, a partnership firm, against the Executive Engineer of the Karna...