Karnataka High Court Writ Petition Involving Zilla Panchayat Office Bearers. Multiple Individuals Filed Petition Against State Authorities Relating to Panchayat Raj Elections.
6 Jan 2017...
Search Results for "validity period"
6721 result(s) found
Found 6721 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature of Bombay at Aurangabad Adjudicates Constitutional Challenge to Provisions Enabling Conversion of Municipal Council to Corporation Without Consultation. Petitioners Argue That Section 3(4) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and Proviso to Section 6(1)(d) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 Violate Article 243Q.
20 Feb 2014The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by fifteen former corporators of the Parbhani Municipal Council. They chall...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Assessment Orders Issued in Trade Name Despite Proprietor's Participation — Estoppel by Conduct Bars Challenge to Notice. The Court held that assessment orders are not non-est merely because notices were issued in the trade name, as the proprietor participated in proceedings without objection.
15 Mar 2016The case involves multiple sales tax references filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax against M/s. Klip Nail Care and other respondents. The common q...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Venture Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Agreement. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked for disputes arising from Joint Venture Agreement dated 28th March, 2007.
6 May 2022The applicant, M/s. Atul & Arkade Realty, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitrat...
- 76
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Waitlisted Candidate in UP Higher Education Service Appointment Case — Section 13(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980 Permits Fresh Recommendation for Waitlisted Candidate to a Different College. The Court held that the provision is intended to fill vacancies efficiently and does not restrict the candidate to the original recommendation, distinguishing Kamlesh Kumar Sharma v. Yogesh Kumar Gupta.
1 Jan 2026The appellant, Dr. Manoj Kumar Rawat, was a waitlisted candidate for the post of Principal in PG and UG non-Government Aided Colleges in Uttar Pradesh...
- 140
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Office Memorandum Allowing Post Facto CRZ Clearance for Permissible Activities. Environmental Organization Contended That the 2021 Circular Contravenes Mandatory Prior Clearance Requirement Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
24 Sep 2024The present Public Interest Litigation invoked the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...
- 838
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sanction of Revised Development Plan Under MRTP Act. Delay in Notification Under Section 31(4) Held Directory, Not Invalidating Sanction.
22 Apr 2015The case involves two writ petitions challenging the sanction of a Revised Development Plan for Karad Municipal Council under the Maharashtra Regional...
- 257
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Amendment to Section 10(3) of KVAT Act, 2005 — Restriction on Input Tax Credit for Inter-State Purchases Upheld. The court held that the amendment is a valid legislative measure to prevent tax evasion and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.
29 Mar 2016The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies, including Sonal Apparel Private Limited and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Priv...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Construction Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' claim of non-compliance with Section 126(4) MRTP Act fails as award was passed under Land Acquisition Act and possession taken long ago.
24 Mar 2023The petitioners, owners of land in Latur, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Municipal Council for construction of a development plan roa...
- 18
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Winding Up of Mutual Fund Schemes and Interprets SEBI Regulations. The Court examined the interrelation and constitutional validity of Regulations 39 to 42 with Regulation 18(15)(c) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, while deferring final adjudication pending statutory proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992.
14 Jul 2021The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals concerning the interpretation and application of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual...
- 351
