Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2435 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2435 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Agreement to Sell Between Landlord and Tenant Terminates Tenancy Under Section 111 Transfer of Property Act. Part Payment of Consideration with Clause for Refund and Restoration of Possession Did Not Evidence Surrender or Cessation of Landlord-Tenant Relationship.

1 Jan 1970

The litigation arose from a dispute over a shop premises in Pune. The original plaintiff, predecessor of the respondents, owned a shop and let it to t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 2(24)(xviii) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petitioner contended that taxing capital subsidies as income violates Articles 14, 19, 246, 265 and 289 of Constitution; final decision not stated in available text.

4 Dec 2023

Serum Institute of India Private Limited, a biotechnology company manufacturing drugs and vaccines with a plant at Hadapsar, Pune, filed the writ peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Section 2(24)(xviii) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Petitioner Challenges Taxation of Capital Subsidies as Income. The Court considered whether inclusion of subsidies and incentives in the definition of income under Section 2(24)(xviii) violates constitutional provisions and real income theory.

4 Dec 2023

The writ petition arose from a challenge to the constitutional validity of sub-clause (xviii) to Section 2(24) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, inserted b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Dispute on Gas Connection Charges. Measuring Equipment Installed for Supplier's Billing Purposes Not Taxable Under 'Supply of Tangible Goods Service' as Customer Does Not Use the Equipment.

28 Aug 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal which set aside a demand for service tax on gas connection ch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Process Not Amounting to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court Holds That Internal Order Deciding Jurisdiction Is Not Appealable Under Section 35 of the Act.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of Milind Kulkarni Due to Negligent Driving of Tanker. Court applies multiplier method under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and grants additional compensation for loss of consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses.

26 Jun 2020

The appellants, being the widow, daughter, father (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), and brother of the deceased Milind Dinkar Kulkarni, fi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Building Agreement — Penalty Clause Upheld as Genuine Pre-Estimate of Damages. Court holds that Clause 7 penalty @ ₹10,000 per day for delay is not a secondary obligation but a genuine pre-estimate of damages, and forfeiture of earnest money under Clause 13 is permissible only if no other damages are awarded.

1 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 09.04.2010 between the owners (Bhupesh Bhayana and Kiran Bhayana) and the builder (Vinod Seth, now represent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to MMRDA's Additional Premium Demand — Interpretation of Articles 2(c), 2(d), 2(e) of Lease Deed and Impact of Supplementary Lease Deed. The Court Examines Whether Delay in Construction Attributable to MMRDA's Approvals and Absence of Time Limit for Additional Built-Up Area Renders Demand Arbitrary.

8 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from a demand notice issued by the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) to the Indian Newspaper Society (the pet...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, Limitation Barred Suit. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and payment of earnest money; suit filed beyond three years from date of refusal.

29 Apr 2025

The present Regular First Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 03.08.2022 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Dharwad, in O....

74 75 76 77 78

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)