Search Results for "delayed claim"

1947 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1947 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit, Sets Aside Decree Due to Non-Production of Best Evidence. Adverse Inference Drawn Under Section 114(g) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Against Plaintiff Who Failed to Produce Written Agreement and Delivery Challans.

The appellant, Karnataka State Agro Corn Products Ltd., a Government of Karnataka undertaking, was the defendant in a suit for recovery of money filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Condition of Security for Vacating Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit - Cargo Owner Not Liable for Demurrage and Port Charges as They Are Not Party to Contract of Carriage

The appellant, Best Food International Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against an order dated 4th February 2010 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.

The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Redevelopment Dispute – Plaintiff Seeks Eviction of Remaining Occupants under Development Agreement. Court Addresses Whether Non-Cooperating Occupants Can Be Compelled to Vacate Pending Suit Where Majority Have Already Vacated.

This matter arises from an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Ambit Life Style Homes LLP, in a suit for enforcement of a registered developme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Applicability of Written Statement Time Limit to Counter-Claim in Commercial Suits. The Court Examined Whether the 120-Day Limit Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Applies to Plaintiffs' Reply to Counter-Claims Governed by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

This matter arose from a commercial suit for recovery of money filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants). The defendan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal, Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Claim Dispute. Discharge Voucher Signed Under Protest and Coercion Does Not Bar Arbitration Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against a Bombay High Court order appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for De Facto Inability to Perform Functions. Arbitrator's Order Returning Statement of Claim and Rejecting Application for Termination of Mandate Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Amar Tea Distributors, a partnership firm, entered into a Distributor Agreement with the respondent, Coca-Cola India Pvt. Ltd., on 7th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order Allowing Counter-Claim in Property Suit. Amendment of Plaint After Issues Settled Constitutes Exceptional Circumstance Justifying Filing of Counter-Claim Under Order VIII Rule 6-A CPC.

The petitioner, Vijaymala Sidling Doijad, filed a suit (Regular Civil Suit No.1056 of 2006) seeking injunction against the State of Maharashtra and th...