Search Results for "Vague Averments"

860 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 860 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Late Filing of Written Statement in Civil Suit — Violation of Order 8 Rule 1 CPC. Court holds that discretion to condone delay in filing written statement must be supported by sufficient cause and cannot be exercised mechanically.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No. 294/2010 pending before the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge (Rural), Ahmedabad, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Contract Dispute — Remands Case for Fresh Consideration of Counterclaim Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Lead Evidence on Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 6A CPC Warrants Remand.

The appellant, Executive Engineer of Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, filed a suit for damages of Rs. 17,28,855.65 against the respondent, Kat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Contract Dispute — Remands for Fresh Trial Due to Improper Issue Framing. Trial court's failure to frame proper issues and appreciate evidence regarding delay in construction contract warrants remand for fresh adjudication of suit and counterclaim.

The present first appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 8th March 2000 passed by the learned Second Joint Civil Judge (SD), Kachchh at Bhuj, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Money Lending and Criminal Intimidation Case Due to Settlement. The court held that private disputes settled amicably between parties warrant quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 528 BNSS.

The applicant, Ghelubha Juvansinh Zala, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses PIL Against Private School for Lack of Bonafide Interest and Non-Disclosure of Credentials. Court holds that petitioners residing in different districts without disclosing their occupations or motive cannot maintain a public interest litigation against a private school.

The present petition was filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by three petitioners, with petitioner no.1 residing in District Mehsana and petit...