Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Money Lending and Criminal Intimidation Case Due to Settlement. The court held that private disputes settled amicably between parties warrant quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 528 BNSS.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Ghelubha Juvansinh Zala, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. 11192011230031 of 2023 registered at Bopal Police Station, Ahmedabad (Rural), along with the charge-sheet and all consequential proceedings. The FIR alleged offences under Section 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 40(c), 42(a), and 42(d) of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011. The applicant was the nephew of Narendrasinh Kanubha Parmar, a friend of the complainant's father, Nitinbhai Ghanshyambhai Mehta. The dispute arose from a money lending transaction in 2015. The parties, with the intervention of family members and friends, settled the matter amicably. The complainant, respondent no. 2, filed an affidavit confirming the settlement and stating no objection to the quashing of the FIR. The court, after hearing the parties, found that the dispute was private in nature and the settlement was genuine. The court held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law and quashed the FIR, charge-sheet, and all related proceedings to secure the ends of justice.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Settlement - Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - The applicant sought quashing of FIR and charge-sheet for offences under Section 506(2) IPC and Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011. The parties settled the dispute amicably. The Court held that since the dispute is private and settlement is genuine, the FIR and all proceedings are quashed to secure the ends of justice. (Paras 1-5)

B) Money Lending - Offences under Gujarat Money Lenders Act - Sections 40(c), 42(a), 42(d) - The complainant alleged that the applicant was involved in money lending without license and used criminal intimidation. The Court noted that the dispute was essentially a private money lending matter and the settlement between the parties warranted quashing. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet for offences under Section 506(2) IPC and Sections 40(c), 42(a) & 42(d) of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011 should be quashed in light of a settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed FIR No. 11192011230031 of 2023, charge-sheet, and all consequential proceedings.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Settlement
  • Compounding of Offences
  • Section 528 BNSS
  • Section 506 IPC
  • Gujarat Money Lenders Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:18437

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER) NO. 26028 of 2025

2026-03-02

Vimal K. Vyas

2026:GUJHC:18437

Mr. Dharmesh Devnani with Ms. Kitty S. Mehta for applicant, Ms. Asmita Patel for respondent no.1, Mr. B.M. Mangukiya with Ms. Bela A. Prajapati for respondent no.2

Ghelubha Juvansinh Zala

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal miscellaneous application for quashing FIR and charge-sheet

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR, charge-sheet, and all consequential proceedings

Filing Reason

Alleged offences under Section 506(2) IPC and Sections 40(c), 42(a), 42(d) of Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011

Issues

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet should be quashed due to settlement between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the dispute is private and settled amicably. Respondent no.2 (complainant) filed affidavit stating no objection to quashing. State (respondent no.1) left the matter to the court's discretion.

Ratio Decidendi

When the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the complainant has no objection, continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. Hence, to secure the ends of justice, the FIR and all proceedings are quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

By way of preferring the present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks to invoke the inherent powers of this Court praying to quash and set-aside the First Information Report being C.R. No.11192011230031 of 2023 registered with the Bopal Police Station, Ahmedabad (Rural). The parties have settled the dispute amicably and the complainant has filed an affidavit stating no objection to the quashing of the FIR.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Misc. Application No. 26028 of 2025 under Section 528 BNSS for quashing FIR. The court heard the parties and passed the judgment on 02/03/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
  • Indian Penal Code: 506(2)
  • Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011: 40(c), 42(a), 42(d)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Money Lending and Criminal Intimidation Case Due to Settlement. The court held that private disputes settled amicably between parties warrant quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 528 BNSS.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Restores Developer as Party in Consumer Complaint Under RERA — Deletion Order Set Aside Due to Prima Facie Connection with Project. The Court held that the definition of 'promoter' under Section 2(zk) of the Real Est...