WRIT PETITION NO.1501 OF 2016
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"
2138 result(s) found
Found 2138 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief and Change of Opinion. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.
30 Jun 2023The petitioner, Vedanta Limited (formerly Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures Limited), challenged a notice dated 28 March 2008 issued under Section 1...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Zilla Parishad Member Challenging Election Disqualification on Age Grounds. School Register Entry Not Conclusive Proof of Age Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.
10 Jun 2010The petitioner, Sou. Manisha Sanjay Waskar, was a member of the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur, elected from Panchgaon constituency. Respondent No.1, Anil @...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Order Against Co-operative Credit Society for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escapement. Reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 held invalid as notice was based on borrowed satisfaction and non-application of mind.
20 Feb 2023The petitioner, Mumbai Postal Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., a co-operative credit society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative ...
- 107
High Court
Karnataka High Court Issues Directions to BBMP to Demolish Illegal Construction by Adjoining Landowner for Gross Violation of Building Bye-Laws. BBMP Officials Found to Have Failed in Statutory Duty to Inspect and Enforce Commencement Certificate Requirement Under Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Byelaws 2003 and Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976.
19 Nov 2014Background: The petition was filed by the owner of property No.8/2, adjacent to respondents 4 and 5's property No.8/1 in Bangalore. The petitioner all...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.
8 Dec 2016The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petitions Challenging Returned Candidate's Scheduled Caste Status in Latur Parliamentary Constituency. Court holds that caste validity certificate issued by Scrutiny Committee is conclusive and cannot be collaterally challenged in election petition under Section 100 of Representation of the People Act, 1951.
10 Sep 2024The judgment concerns two election petitions filed under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the election of Dr. Shi...
- 637
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Judgment Upholding Sanction of Competing Slum Scheme; Appeal Ongoing.
1 Jan 1970The dispute centered on a 2,005 sq. mts. parcel in Malad, Mumbai, originally declared a slum in 1987 under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Cl...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Dispute Under Section 91 of MCS Act Maintainable Against Expulsion Under Section 35. Cooperative Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide Validity of Expulsion Resolution, Remedy Under Section 91 Not Barred by Section 35 Appeal.
4 Oct 2013The appellant, a member of the respondent housing society, filed a dispute under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 before ...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Debarment Order in Import License Dispute — Validity of Imports Under Additional Licenses Despite Public Notice Upheld. Imports of Colour Picture Tubes and Video Tape Deck Mechanism under licenses issued before Public Notice No.109 dated 21-3-1989 were valid under Para 215 of AM-88-91 Policy.
18 Feb 2011The petitioners, M/s. Videocon International Ltd. and Mr. Maheshwar V. Kasbekar, were manufacturers of colour TVs, videos, and other electronic items....
- 99
