Search Results for "Loan Recovery"

1695 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1695 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRAT Order Allowing Bank to Sell Secured Assets Despite Company Being in Liquidation. SARFAESI Act Proceedings Held Not Barred by Companies Act Winding Up Provisions; Secured Creditor's Right to Enforce Security Interest Prevails.

The petitioners, Capt. G.R. Gopinath and M/s Deccan Emerging Business Ventures Limited, challenged the order dated 06.01.2017 passed by the Debt Recov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Debenture Trustee Seeking Enforcement of Security Interest Against Developer and Its Directors Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Trustee Is a 'Secured Creditor' Entitled to Take Possession of Mortgaged Property Despite Pending RERA Proceedings.

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, a debenture trustee, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Collector, Pune, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Certificate in Cooperative Loan Dispute for Lack of Reasoned Order. Rule 86F of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 Mandates Speaking Order Before Issuance of Certificate; Revisional Authority's Dismissal Without Considering Written Arguments Set Aside.

The petitioner, Balasaheb Dhondiram Nikam, a pensioner, challenged a recovery notice dated 25 July 2011 issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Priority Dispute Between SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act. SARFAESI Act's Express Priority Provisions Under Section 26E Prevail Over MSMED Act's Recovery Mechanism, as No Conflict Exists and Priority Must Be Expressly Provided.

The dispute arose from conflicting recovery claims under the SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act against a debtor, Mission Vivacare, which had defaulted on loa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal Against National Textile Corporation in Pre-Nationalisation Dues Dispute. Claims for pre-nationalisation period cannot be enforced against the successor entity under the Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995.

The dispute arose from credit facilities extended by UCO Bank (appellant) to Shree Sitaram Mills Ltd., which was taken over by the National Textile Co...