Search Results for "Arbitrary Refusal"

981 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 981 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Part in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement Upheld but Back Wages Denied. Termination without proper inquiry constituted unfair labour practice under MRTU and PULP Act, but employee's habitual absenteeism justified denial of back wages.

The Petitioner, Dattaprasad Narayan Kulkarni, was employed as a Technical Officer with M/s. Auchtel Products Ltd. (formerly Henkel Chemicals (I) Ltd.)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of Headmaster for Misconduct and Moral Turpitude. School Tribunal's order upheld as findings of misconduct were based on evidence and no procedural violation under MEPS Act.

The petitioner, Fr. Peter Thamaji Amolik, was appointed as headmaster of St. Xavier's High School, Aurangabad, on 18.10.2000 by the respondent society...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Counting Probationary Service as Qualifying Service for Pension — State Bank of India Employee's Probation Period Counts Towards Pensionable Service Under SBI Pension Rules.

The petitioner, Mrs. Sameedha Suhas Deshpande, was appointed as a Cashier-cum-Clerk in the State Bank of India (SBI) on 23rd October 1985, subject to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Subsequent Purchaser Against Refusal to Condon Delay of 3.5 Years in Filing Appeal. Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5 - Condonation of Delay - Sufficient Cause Not Established - Delay of 3.5 Years Not Explained.

The appellants, Modu Sonsing Vanjari and others, were subsequent purchasers of property. They filed an appeal against a decree passed by the trial cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in MPID Act Case Due to Chargesheet Not Taken Cognizance Within 90 Days. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues when the chargesheet is not taken cognizance within the prescribed period, even if physically filed earlier.

The applicant, Wasudeo Shrawan Kamble, was arrested on 13 July 2020 in connection with Crime No. 427/2020 registered at Police Station Ballarshah, Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal of Leave to Adduce Additional Evidence in Civil Suit — Petitioner Failed to Show Due Diligence in Producing Documents at Appropriate Stage.

The petitioner, defendant No.5 in a civil suit filed by Khandelwal Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 26/04/2018 passed by the City Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Order Recording Settlement in Arbitration Challenge. Parties Bound by Compromise Under Order XXIII Rules 1 & 3 CPC; No Appeal Lies Against Consent Order.

The appellant, Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation, entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Antony Waste Handling Cell Pvt. Ltd., f...